I agree with David with regard to this logic. Poetical qualities (however we define them) are within the lyric whether it is with music or not - they are therefore 'literature'. I tried to say this early in the discussion re Dylan, maybe the music helps put the phrase in the brain but once it's there the phrase, line, lyric stays in the brain as words and what it is that those words do to you - how that cannot be literature I just don't get, unless a definition of 'literature' is so limited that it contradicts itself e.g. poor poems on the page.
On 22 Oct 2016, at 12:47, David Lace wrote:
> True, Robin that is the “dictionary” distinction between them. But Jamie seems to be saying that without the music the lyrics of a song are without any “poetical” qualities. But as I said before, many poems are without poetical qualities, yet are considered literature. I’m not saying here, by the way, that all songs are poetical, many are obviously not, but many are.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------Original Message--------------------
>
> Robin Hamilton wrote:
>
> Short answer, lyrics need music, poetry doesn't. Houseman is easier to set to music than Donne.
|