To follow on from my email yesterday, does anyone know of any published or
standardised controlled vocabularies for DAMS? I might be hoping too much
here, but any cultural heritage versions out there? If not any thoughts on
why have we not made any progress here yet?
Regards
Tony
[image: cid:image001.png@01CF86F9.22C2BC80]
*Tony Harris*
Digital Media & Photography Officer
Government Art Collection
tony.harris @culture.gov.uk <[log in to unmask]>* |* 020 7211 2426
[image: cid:image002.jpg@01CF86F9.22C2BC80]@govartcol [image:
cid:image003.jpg@01CF86F9.22C2BC80] /governmentartcollection |
www.gac.culture.gov.uk
On 27 April 2016 at 14:52, Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello,
> For those of you with a DAMS (Digital Asset Management System), would
> anyone be willing to share your terminologies/hierarchies document with me
> to see what terms you think are pretty much standard terms that an ingestor
> / keyworder would input and so not deviate from?
> Thanks in advance
> Tony Harris
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01CF86F9.22C2BC80]
>
> *Tony Harris*
> Digital Media & Photography Officer
> Government Art Collection
> tony.harris @culture.gov.uk <[log in to unmask]>* |* 020 7211
> 2426
> [image: cid:image002.jpg@01CF86F9.22C2BC80]@govartcol [image:
> cid:image003.jpg@01CF86F9.22C2BC80] /governmentartcollection |
> www.gac.culture.gov.uk
>
>
>
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|