Hi,
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 07:04 , Bill Long <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> And, it is perhaps mentioning that any change that affects the typing system (apart from trivial syntax enhancements like type(integer)) can involve non-trivial implementation issues.
So if someone wants to propose enums, first tell us what
you want the enums to do. If we can find a good set of use-cases,
then we’ll ask the standards committee’s Data subgroup to propose
the specifications.
Are logical (i/o) units to become enums?
How ‘bout kind parameters per type?
Array subscripts? Character indexes?
What else ya got? ;-)
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
|