I have to say I think it's a healthy development.
The date of revalidation is important information, given that we have a voluntary system. If it were compulsory, then there would be no point in including it. It would be a condition of inclusion on the register, and if a member had not revalidated within the prescribed period, they would not be on the register.
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 15:29, Frances Hendrix <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I think they need to address the questions and concerns
> f
>
>
> Frances Hendrix
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Library and Information Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roger Farbey
> Sent: 18 February 2016 15:15
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: CILIP and its forthcoming Online Register of Practitioners
>
> Charles
>
> CILIP definitely offers members the opportunity to opt out of the online register, However, as I read it, and having clicked on the opt out form but not used it, it would appear that this is a "nuclear" option which simultaneously removes the member from *both* the online and print CILIP Yearbook. I agree, perhaps a representative of CILIP would care to address these concerns.
>
> Roger
|