It wasn't my intention to bring up Gobekli Tepe in this discussion. But GeoCur has. And you have responded. So I must respond too.
You write, "... It [my article on Gobekli Tepe] leaves out many aspects that were theoretically found in the garden, such as no real evidence of a large amount of wooden planking, or the huge amount of bitumen that lined the wood, or the large amount of lead used, or the 22 feett thick walls. Plus I just don't agree with the location."
As you point out, these are "theoretical". Meaning, of course, they may not be found at all. Gobekli Tepe was reclaimed and used for agriculture for millennia following the collapse and rapid burial of the site (the open space below the hanging gardens when these caved-in). The large Palm tree trunks that underlined the garden beds would have protruded above the dirt and rubble. They would have been reclaimed and used elsewhere as valuable construction material. Or simply cleared away for the agricultural tilling of the land. Though these "theoretically" would be there, practically they would not be there.
As to your other points. Nothing in what was written or we know states explicitly there was only ONE "hanging garden" of Babylon. Or where it was. Likely, there were several. And at several different locations. The "hanging gardens" mentioned by Hero of Byzantium in his "Seven Wonders" was a "must see" destination for tourists traveling from Byzantium and other Asia Minor cities to Alexandria, Egypt. Ursa was a major city along that travel route. And is located in Ancient Mesopotamia/Babylon. And the "Hanking Gardens" at Gobekli Tepe were nearby. Hero's "Seven Wonders" was an early "tourist guide" for these travelers. I don't think Hero would have send them off to distant Bagdad or elsewhere sightseeing.
As for your comments on the TV series, why then call it "10,000 BC" ? If it wan't about 10,000BC? The title is contrived for a purpose!
@GeoCur, you write, "A better guide is the convergent evidence found at a monument like Gobekli Tepe ,built c.12,000 YA ."
Current views on Gobekli Tepe (and other examples you site) are current interpretations based on wishy-washy reasoning using unwarranted assumptions driven by ancestral worship.
I argued the argument, "if we can do a task using primitive tools than prehistoric people could have done similar tasks using the same tools", is fundamentally wrong. Do you dispute that?
Or is it the "principle of survival" as applied to prehistoric people that you have problems with.
@Dave Tooke, you write, "Hunter-Gatherers had more leisure time than we do today. [...] Agriculture is much harder work."
What is your theory, then, why prehistoric people would abandon a life of ease and leisure in an affluent hunter-gatherers Eden for a life of toil and suffering in an agricultural Inferno?"
[log in to unmask]
From: Little Light <[log in to unmask]>
To: BRITARCH <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2016 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] 10,000BC new series
I read that article on Gobleki Tepe being the Ancient Hanging Gardens of
Babylon and as well as it's written, it leaves out many aspects that
were theoretically found in the garden, such as no real evidence of a
large amount of wooden planking, or the huge amount of bitumen that
lined the wood, or the large amount of lead used, or the 22 feett thick
walls. Plus I just don't agree with the location.
As for the TV series, isn't the whole aspect of the programme supposed
to be showing how people of modern society could cope in ancient
circumstances? They wouldn't have any knowledge of how to live like a
stone age hunter/gatherer and have to learn the hard way. It is an
entertainment show with a bit of history rather than the other way
around. It really does show how most people would act if something did
happen that caused an "end of the world scenario". Most wouldn't be
able to cope, they would be the first victims of any kind of
"Armageddon" Without mobile phones and access to the pleasant sides of
life, they would crumple into a gibbering wreck. It's normally the well
prepared and the most unlikely of people that will survive. Take that
other TV programme that was on before Christmas, Hunted, who would have
believed the final competitors who made it to the plane. The ones that
had done their research or prepared in advance were caught. There is a
lot to learn from the new series of 10,000BC that we could do well in
taking in and remembering.
On 23/01/2016 10:59 AM, George Currie wrote:
> "Our differences with them is some 12,000 years of cultural, social and intellectual evolution. To argue (as GeoCur and many others have and do), if we can do a task using primitive tools than prehistoric people could have done similar tasks using the same tools, is fundamentally wrong.
> Our best guide to what prehistoric people would likely have done is to start with the physical conditions they had to endure. And apply the 'principle of survival' to their actions and intentions. I seriously doubt they would have the leisure and the decadence to self-indulge in impractical 'monument building'."
> A better guide is the convergent evidence found at a monument like Gobekli Tepe ,built c.12,000 YA .
> As far as I am aware there is only one person who "argues" against this evidence .
> See . <a removedlink__2bbcfc53-0dea-4675-8e1f-f981606aa76a__href="http: tinyurl.com="" gvq9lwe" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/gvq9lwe
> This is equally as hilarious as the "argument " for the inability of decadent ,self indulgent Neolithic/EBA builders to build monuments such as Stonehenge , cursus , long barrows etc .