JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCPEM Archives


CCPEM Archives

CCPEM Archives


CCPEM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCPEM Home

CCPEM Home

CCPEM  November 2015

CCPEM November 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: post-processing in relion 1.4: memory allocation and seg fault

From:

Sjors Scheres <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sjors Scheres <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:41:47 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (146 lines)

Dear Alex,
This seems to be a very big box. You seem to run out of memory, so just
running on a bigger one should solve your problem. If you could run the
refinement on a cluster, the same nodes should be big enough, but make
sure you ask for enough RAM in your scheduler. Using or not using the MTF
doesn't affect the memory requirements.
HTH,
Sjors
> Dear Sjors
>
> when i try post-processing the model i got in 3D auto-refine step on an
> interactive node of a cluster, i.e. without
> submitting to the queueing system, i get memory allocation error:
>
> Executing: `which relion_postprocess` --i Refine3D/run1 --o
> Refine3D/postprocess  --angpix 1.12 --auto_mask  --inimask_threshold 0.01
> --extend_inimask 3 --width_mask_edge 3 --auto_bfac  --autob_lowres 10  &
> == Reading input half-reconstructions:
>   + half1-map:                     Refine3D/run1_half1_class001_unfil.mrc
>   + half2-map:                     Refine3D/run1_half2_class001_unfil.mrc
> == Perform auto-masking ...
>   + density threshold:             0.01
>   + extend ini mask:               3 pixels
>   + width soft edge:               3 pixels
>
> == Extending initial binary mask ...
> 2.52/2.52 min
> ............................................................~~(,_,">
> == Making a soft edge on the extended mask ...
> 2.98/2.98 min
> ............................................................~~(,_,">
> == Masking input maps ...
> +++ RELION: command line arguments (with defaults for optional ones
> between parantheses) +++
> ====== General options =====
>                                 --i : Input rootname, e.g. run1
>                            --angpix : Pixel size in Angstroms
>                   --o (postprocess) : Output rootname
> ====== Masking options =====
>                 --auto_mask (false) : Perform automated masking, based on
> a density threshold
>          --inimask_threshold (0.02) : Density at which to threshold the
> map for the initial seed mask
>               --extend_inimask (3.) : Number of pixels to extend the
> initial seed mask
>              --width_mask_edge (6.) : Width for the raised cosine soft
> mask edge (in pixels)
>                           --mask () : Filename of a user-provided mask
> (1=protein, 0=solvent, all values in range
> [0,1])
> ====== Sharpening options =====
>                            --mtf () : User-provided STAR-file with the
> MTF-curve of the detector
>                 --auto_bfac (false) : Perform automated B-factor
> determination (Rosenthal and Henderson, 2003)
>                --autob_lowres (10.) : Lowest resolution (in A) to include
> in fitting of the B-factor
>                --autob_highres (0.) : Highest resolution (in A) to include
> in fitting of the B-factor
>                   --adhoc_bfac (0.) : User-provided B-factor (in A^2) for
> map sharpening, e.g. -400
> ====== Filtering options =====
>        --skip_fsc_weighting (false) : Do not use FSC-weighting (Rosenthal
> and Henderson, 2003) in the sharpening process
>                     --low_pass (0.) : Resolution (in Angstroms) at which
> to low-pass filter the final map (by default at final
> resolution)
> ====== Expert options =====
>            --randomize_at_fsc (0.8) : Randomize phases from the resolution
> where FSC drops below this value
>             --filter_edge_width (2) : Width of the raised cosine on the
> low-pass filter edge (in resolution shells)
>                          --verb (1) : Verbosity
> Allocate: No space left
> File: ./src/multidim_array.h line: 927
>
> If i try to submit the job to queue (in *_submit.script I can allocate
> more RAM, which I assume is a problem here), i.e. in GUI:
> Post-processing->Running->Submit to Queue->yes,
> I get (even after pressing “Print command”):
> [3]+  Segmentation fault      relion
>
> I run RELION on a 64bit cluster with scientific linux:
> $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.32-504.30.3.el6.x86_64 ([log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>) (gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat
> 4.4.7-11) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Tue Jul 14 11:18:03 CDT 2015
>
> Parameters that I use are set to default except for “Initial
> binarization threshold”, which I set to 0.01 based on checking contour
> level in Chimera.
>
> Are there any tricks to avoid it? Should more allocated RAM fix this
> problem?
>
> Thank you,
> Alex
>
> ps. Indeed I have just managed to run it after increasing allocated RAM,
> however, I get the following, suggesting that resolution became lower
> after refinement:
> $ tail -n 10 Refine3D/run1.out
>  Calculating gold-standard FSC ...
>  Maximization ...
> 5.61/5.61 hrs
> ............................................................~~(,_,">
>  Auto-refine: Refinement has converged, stopping now...
>  Auto-refine: + Final reconstruction from all particles is saved as:
> Refine3D/run1_class001.mrc
>  Auto-refine: + Final model parameters are stored in:
> Refine3D/run1_model.star
>  Auto-refine: + Final data parameters are stored in:
> Refine3D/run1_data.star
>  Auto-refine: + Final resolution (without masking) is: 12.1622
>  Auto-refine: + But you may want to run relion_postprocess to mask the
> unfil.mrc maps and calculate a higher resolution FSC
> DONE
> $ tail -n 10 Refine3D/run2pp.out
>   + correlation of fit:            0
> == Low-pass filtering final map ...
>   + filter frequency:              12.2927
> == Writing out put files ...
>   + Processed map:                 Refine3D/postprocess.mrc
>   + Processed masked map:          Refine3D/postprocess_masked.mrc
>   + Auto-mask:                     Refine3D/postprocess_automask.mrc
>   + Metadata file:                 Refine3D/postprocess.star
>   + FINAL RESOLUTION:              12.2927
> DONE
>
> Can it be because I am not using “MTF of the detector”? I am now
> playing with parameters for “extend binary map” and “add a soft
> edge” - is there anything else I should try out?
>
> Thank you
>
>


-- 
Sjors Scheres
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus
Cambridge CB2 0QH, U.K.
tel: +44 (0)1223 267061
http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/groups/scheres

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager