JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  November 2015

CCP4BB November 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: A polite reminder to xia2 users

From:

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tim Gruene <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:42:20 +0100

Content-Type:

multipart/signed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (262 lines) , signature.asc (262 lines)

Dear Phil,

I suppose the license for software used to analyse ITC does not ask for a 
citation? That's sometimes the case for software that comes with a commercial 
product.

Where positions depend on citations, the software license should be like the 
'Creative Commons' with the addition that 'appropriate credit' means 'citing 
upon publication'. It would then be illegal to use that program and not cite 
it.

Cheers,
Tim

On Friday, November 06, 2015 08:08:54 PM Phil Evans wrote:
> That is a problem: journals have their own policies, despite modern online
> methods. While we all like to be cited, one of my colleagues was recently
> complaining about a 50 reference limit, and was wondering why they were
> expected to reference papers for a dozen or so crystallographic programs,
> while all the biochemical and cell biological methods could be considered
> as “standard” and not need references (no reference for software used to
> analyse ITC or mass spec data for example): not to mention beamlines and
> synchrotrons, which just get an acknowledgement.
> 
> Phil
> 
> > On 6 Nov 2015, at 18:42, Graeme Winter <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > Slightly ignorant and certainly oblique question perhaps, but are there
> > still journals out there which limit the number of references allowed?
> > This used to be a “reason” people would use for not properly citing all
> > of the resources they used in arriving at the results included in the
> > manuscript. In real life, particularly with the move to electronic
> > publication, there should be no excuses or reasons for incomplete
> > citations or citations in supplementary materials (I feel).
> > 
> > I guess it should be possible for e.g. processing software to identify the
> > beamline from the correctly populated image header (*) and make for the
> > user’s convenience some kind of mmCIF file (perhaps) with the appropriate
> > citations for beamline and software for *that* data set – though this
> > would require some infrastructure to exist in a public place (PDB?) where
> > this was stored so the software developers could access it to get the
> > right info. This sounds like something we were all discussing in 2006 ☹
> > 
> > Also, I guess people should know where their data came from & be capable
> > of correctly acknowledging this, but it sounds like this is not the case
> > perhaps? *should* pipeline developers be doing more here?
> > 
> > Cheerio Graeme
> > 
> > =====
> > 
> > (*) no a given I know…
> > 
> > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Marjolein Thunnissen Sent: 06 November 2015 09:12
> > To: ccp4bb
> > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] A polite reminder to xia2 users
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > This is slightly OT for the list as such but it is of interest of the
> > current thread.
> > 
> > I would like to argue that just as important it is to reference to the
> > software in an adequate way, it is also important to give due to the
> > hardware, i.e. the beam lines on which most of the data is collected.
> > Most beamlines have now publications that describe them, it is very
> > important to us that these will be referenced to. This will make it
> > easier for us in the long end to keep them in the best state possible so
> > that you can obtain the best data possible.
> > 
> > best regards
> > 
> > Marjolein Thunnissen
> > 
> > [cid:image001.png@01D11875.0BBFE260]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Dr. Marjolein Thunnissen
> > Science Coordinator Structural Biology
> > Chair Special Interest Group 1 (MX) ECA
> > 
> > MAX IV Laboratory
> > Lund University
> > P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
> > Visiting address: Ole Römers väg 1, 223 63 Lund
> > Telephone: +46 766 32 04 17
> > www.maxlab.lu.se<http://www.maxlab.lu.se/>
> > 
> > 
> > On 05 Nov 2015, at 20:32, Tim Gruene
> > <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> > 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi Jacob,
> > 
> > I tend to follow the authors' suggestion. When you start refmac, even
> > without any options, it says:
> > Main reference
> > 
> >  "REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures:"
> >  G.N.Murshudov, P.Skubak, A.A.Lebedev, N.S.Pannu, R.A.Steiner,
> >  R.A.Nicholls,
> > 
> > M.D.Winn, F.Long and A.A.Vagin,(2011)
> > 
> >  Acta Crystallogr. D67, 355-367
> > 
> > The same is true for many other programs.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Tim
> > 
> > 
> > On Thursday, November 05, 2015 04:22:24 PM Keller, Jacob wrote:
> > 
> > I have a general question about this: many programs in CCP4 have
> > interdependencies, so does one have to ferret out and cite all
> > dependencies? For example, I recently was looking up the citation for
> > Refmac, and was astonished to see the list below. Now, are we really
> > supposed to cite all nine of these for each time Refmac is used/mentioned
> > (provided those features were used)? I certainly understand the reasoning
> > for accumulating citations for continued funding, but, well...really?
> > 
> > JPK
> > 
> > Refmac
> > 
> > "Application of Maximum Likelihood Refinement" G. Murshudov, A.Vagin and
> > E.Dodson, (1996) in the Refinement of Protein structures, Proceedings of
> > Daresbury Study Weekend. "Refinement of Macromolecular Structures by the
> > Maximum-Likelihood method" G.N. Murshudov, A.A.Vagin and E.J.Dodson,
> > (1997)
> > in Acta Cryst. D53, 240-255. "Incorporation of Prior Phase Information
> > Strengthen Maximum-Likelihood Structure Refinemen" N.J.Pannu,
> > G.N.Murshudov, E.J.Dodson and R.J.ReadA (1998) Acta Cryst. section D54,
> > 1285-1294. "Efficient anisotropic refinement of Macromolecular structures
> > using FFT" G.N.Murshudov, A.Lebedev, A.A.Vagin, K.S.Wilson and E.J.Dodson
> > (1999) Acta Cryst. section D55, 247-255. "Use of TLS parameters to model
> > anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement" M. Winn, M. Isupov
> > and G.N.Murshudov (2000) Acta Cryst. 2001:D57 122-133 "Fisher's
> > information
> > matrix in maximum likelihood molecular refinement." Steiner R, Lebedev, A,
> > Murshudov GN. Acta Cryst. 2003 D59: 2114-2124 "Macromolecular TLS
> > refinement in REFMAC at moderate resolutions," Winn MD, Murshudov GN,
> > Papiz
> > MZ. Method in Enzymology, 2003:374 300-321 "Direct incorporation of
> > experimental phase information in model refinement" Skubak P, Murshudov
> > GN,
> > Pannu NS. Acta Cryst. 2004 D60: 2196-2201 "REFMAC5 dictionary:
> > organisation
> > of prior chemical knowledge and guidelines for its use." Vagin, AA,
> > Steiner, RS, Lebedev, AA, Potterton, L, McNicholas, S, Long, F and
> > Murshudov, GN. Acta Cryst. 2004 D60: 2284-2295
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Graeme Winter Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:07 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: [ccp4bb] A polite reminder to xia2 users
> > 
> > Dear xia2 users on the CCP4bb,
> > 
> > While we of course welcome any recognition of the use of xia2 in structure
> > depositions and publications, we would like to gently remind users that
> > xia2 uses other software *on your behalf* for example but not limited to
> > XDS, pointless, aimless, mosflm, DIALS, CCP4. Please could you also
> > include
> > the citations for these packages in your publications and depositions, so
> > that the software used on your behalf gets appropriate recognition :)
> > 
> > This is made slightly easier for you as xia2 writes out appropriate
> > citations for the packages it has used as illustrated here
> > 
> > http://xia2.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/xia2-citing-software-xia2-has-used.html
> > 
> > If you have found xia2 *and* XDS useful (say) in a PDB deposition where
> > the
> > processing was performed with xia2 -3d, then appropriate text could be
> > 
> > REMARK 200  INTENSITY-INTEGRATION SOFTWARE : xia2/XDS
> > REMARK 200  DATA SCALING SOFTWARE          : xia2/XSCALE
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > 
> > REMARK 200  INTENSITY-INTEGRATION SOFTWARE : xia2/MOSFLM
> > 
> > REMARK 200  DATA SCALING SOFTWARE          : xia2/AIMLESS
> > 
> > since this would recognise the contributions of the program authors while
> > making it clear that the "blame" for any poor choices made in the
> > processing belonged to xia2.
> > 
> > We appreciate in some cases (not limited to Diamond Light Source) the MTZ
> > file from your data may appear "by magic" and you may not have run the
> > software yourself - even in this case it should be straightforward to find
> > out from the log file, which should be looked at, which packages were
> > used.
> > 
> > We appreciate your help with this, it makes our relationship with other
> > program authors *much* easier.
> > 
> > Thanks & best wishes Graeme
> > - --
> > - --
> > Paul Scherrer Institut
> > Tim Gruene
> > - - persoenlich -
> > OFLC/102
> > CH-5232 Villigen PSI
> > phone: +41 (0)56 310 5754
> > 
> > GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v2
> > 
> > iD8DBQFWO67VUxlJ7aRr7hoRAnpmAJ9okhimWn+jf5v3VAKjd1uTi2xQEQCeLOfw
> > FroobO8eSH1TBOsXBqlPaRs=
> > =Fvm3
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or
> > privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only.
> > If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the
> > addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not
> > use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached
> > to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the
> > individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light
> > Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free
> > from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may
> > sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or
> > with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679).
> > Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond
> > House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11
> > 0DE, United Kingdom
-- 
--
Paul Scherrer Institut
Dr. Tim Gruene
- persoenlich -
OFLC/102
CH-5232 Villigen PSI
phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297

GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager