I also don't see a problem with reporting R-merge.
Quyen
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Ed Pozharski
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 2:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: Ed Pozharski
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] NSMB Still Has Rmerge?
No objection here.
On 11/13/2015 05:04 PM, Tim Gruene wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> even better to make unmerged data a deposition requirement.
>
> Best,
> Tim
>
> On Friday, November 13, 2015 02:07:22 PM Ed Pozharski wrote:
>> There is nothing wrong with reporting Rmerge per se. The best place to
>> address this is probably PDB - if CC1/2, for example, becomes a deposition
>> requirement, you can always track it down whether it's included in the
>> paper or not. Standardizing "Table 1" across journal universe would be
>> impractical.
>>
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device
> - --
> - --
> Paul Scherrer Institut
> Tim Gruene
> - - persoenlich -
> OFLC/102
> CH-5232 Villigen PSI
> phone: +41 (0)56 310 5754
>
> GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iD8DBQFWRl5uUxlJ7aRr7hoRAq1qAKDJQ9D7mRmWz/q3swX3K3SSdbwjPgCgyTbW
> 1rRT+q/nZKfo1MVUM1q9+08=
> =uEri
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
|