On 11/4/15, Constantinos Ragazas
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> So, in your view, what makes this particular "rock art" 14,000 years old? I'd rather know!
The date of this find is not under question here, and I have no view
on it either.
I am not party to this excavation, and so do not have the relevant
detailed knowledge of the site to give you any answer.
I suspect the excavators have valid reasoning in providing their date,
from the evidence they have found at the site.
I suggest you wait, like the rest of us, for the published report.