Though I am quite willing to accept the art option, once all the
practical functions been thoroughly ruled out.
On 11/3/15, John Wood <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 11/3/15, Eve Richardson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "The microscopic study... shows that there is organisation to the
> design, with two groups of lines, one set straight and made with a
> fine tool, and another more curved and often broader."
> More than one use for the cutting board?
> Perhaps it could have been an heirloom, a useful rock, used
> generation, after generation, but not always for the same purpose.
> If this actually art, where have all the cutting surfaces gone? Surely
> they had them.