On 11/4/15, Constantinos Ragazas
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> But how do you systematically "layer solid ground" in the dry open fields without such
> disturbing and disruptive natural processes? In my view, no archeological
> site can be said to have a "secure context" based on such stratigraphy.
The archaeological 'layering' is the primarily the result of man-made
'disturbing and distruptive' pocesses.
> Archeological dates based on stratigraphy does not make sense to me. Though
> it certainly can provide archeology "secure" dating methodology.
Doesn't this contradict your paragraph above? Pourquoi?