JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


FSL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

FSL  October 2015

FSL October 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: P.S. Re: [FSL] b0 distortion correction using T2-w image + eddy

From:

Barbara Kreilkamp <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:49:24 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (53 lines)

Dear Jesper,

Thanks a lot, this helps.
I will try what you suggest on my already collected data and report 
back, as I don't have b0 with opposing PE.

All the best wishes,
Barbara



On 16/10/2015 15:31, Jesper Andersson wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I forgot to mention in my earlier reply that in the, unfortunate, case that you have already acquired your data and you don’t have data with opposed PE directions you _may_ be able to use your T2 structural.
>
> You would then pass your EPI-b0 and your T2 into topup and specify a very low readout value (implying no distortions) for the T2 volume. If the contrast of your T2 struct and your b0 is similar enough this might give you a reasonably good estimate of the field. I have seen this work in the past.
>
> That field you can then pass into eddy to the --topup parameter.
>
> For the future I strongly recommend acquiring b0 with opposing PE as part of your DTI protocol.
>
> Jesper
>
>> Dear Barbara,
>>
>> it is not sufficient to pass a corrected b0 image to eddy. You need to pass it a susceptibility field as calculated by the FSL tool topup. topup requires at least two volumes acquired with different PE-directions in order to estimate the field. This would typically be two b0 images acquired with PE A->P and PE P->A, but can also be for example two b0 acquired A->P and L->R. We also recommend using the first b0 images acquired as part of your DTI protocol as the first image of the pair that is passed to topup.
>>
>> There is more informations and recommendations on the wikihelp.
>>
>> Jesper
>> On 16 Oct 2015, at 14:44, Barbara Kreilkamp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear FSL list,
>>>
>>> Could you please advise me on how to incorporate a b0 geometric distortion correction procedure?
>>>
>>> My workflow has been like this:
>>> (1) I use eddy_correct (flirt with 6 dof) on the b0 images
>>> (2) I take the mean of these co-registered b0 images
>>> (3) I extract this mean b0 image and register it to the T2-w structural scan I have (using Bspline co-registration in Slicer)
>>> (4) I bring the image to diffusion space (running flirt -dof 6 -nosearch on the new b0 to bring it to the original raw first b0 space) and merge with the raw DWI, now I run eddy.
>>>
>>> I noticed in some participants the b0 and DWI images don't overlap very well after running eddy, especially where the geometric distortions had been previously. Although for all DWI the eddy currents and gross motion is corrected for beautifully in eddy.
>>>
>>> Could you please explain why eddy does not seem to perform very well in terms of non-linear alignment of DWI to my new b0 image?
>>> Would you recommend I run my steps in a different order?
>>> Would you please point me to a publication on eddy?
>>>
>>> Thank you so much,
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Barbara

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager