Dear André,
A few days ago, André Neves posted this statement to the list: “… I saw with my initial experiments that machines are better than humans in select elements more suitable to users' needs.”
This issue returns with Klaus’s note to Carlos: “someone who claims machines could design owes us a demonstration that it can do it on its own -- without hidden help from humans.”
You launched several threads with your original comment that machine can design. Now you state that your initial experiments show that machines are better than humans in selecting elements that are more suitable to users’ needs that those selected by human designers.
What is the evidence for this claim? How do you know? Have you tested this with respect to actual human users in different contexts?
If you’ve done experiments to the point that you can make this statement on the list, it would be useful for you to share your results.
Yours,
Ken
Ken Friedman, PhD, DSc (hc), FDRS | Editor-in-Chief | 设计 She Ji. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation | Published by Elsevier in Cooperation with Tongji University | URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/she-ji-the-journal-of-design-economics-and-innovation/
Chair Professor of Design Innovation Studies | College of Design and Innovation | Tongji University | Shanghai, China ||| University Distinguished Professor | Centre for Design Innovation | Swinburne University of Technology | Melbourne, Australia
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|