Yes I agree Mark, and that is so often the case.
On 23 Aug 2015, at 18:12, Mark Weiss wrote:
> She should read more. "Avant garde" is a contested term, but she seems to believe that it represents only one of the strains of what's being written.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Aug 23, 2015 12:52 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: "Delusions of Whiteness in the Avant-Garde" by Cathy Park Hong
>>
>> Thanks for sending David.
>>
>> Well, i've seen that idea aired before, but never with such vehement certainty. It has an echo of my own observation of how an avant-garde fleeing the constraints of identity is diametrically opposed by a poetics influenced by identity politics. Bringing in the rather too obvious example of Goldsmith however is cheap, but it's a cheap and shallow polemic anyway, nasty too, using what are emotions arising from real and very urgent issues to scattergun other stuff.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> On 23 Aug 2015, at 15:05, David Lace wrote:
>>
>>> "Delusions of Whiteness in the Avant-Garde" by Cathy Park Hong
>>>
>>> First paragraph:
>>>
>>> "To encounter the history of avant-garde poetry is to encounter a racist tradition. From its early 20th century inception to some of its current strains, American avant-garde poetry has been an overwhelmingly white enterprise, ignoring major swaths of innovators—namely poets from past African American literary movements—whose prodigious writings have vitalized the margins, challenged institutions, and introduced radical languages and forms that avant-gardists have usurped without proper acknowledgment. Even today, its most vocal practitioners cling to moldering Eurocentric practices. Even today, avant-garde’s most vocal, self-aggrandizing stars continue to be white and even today these stars like Kenneth Goldsmith spout the expired snake oil that poetry should be “against expression” and “post-identity.” James Baldwin wrote that “to be black was to confront, and to be forced to alter conditions forged in history . . . it is clearly at least equally difficult to surmount the delusion of whiteness.” The avant-garde’s “delusion of whiteness” is the specious belief that renouncing subject and voice is anti-authoritarian, when in fact such wholesale pronouncements are clueless that the disenfranchised need such bourgeois niceties like voice to alter conditions forged in history. The avant-garde’s “delusion of whiteness” is the luxurious opinion that anyone can be “post-identity” and can casually slip in and out of identities like a video game avatar, when there are those who are consistently harassed, surveilled, profiled, or deported for whom they are. But perhaps that is why historically the minority poets’ entrance into the avant-garde’s arcane little clubs has so often been occluded. We can never laugh it off, take it all in as one sick joke, and truly escape the taint of subjectivity and history. But even in their best efforts in erasure, in complete transcription, in total paratactic scrambling, there is always a subject—and beyond that, the specter of the author’s visage—and that specter is never, no matter how vigorous the erasure, raceless."
>>>
>>> http://www.lanaturnerjournal.com/print-issue-7-contents/delusions-of-whiteness-in-the-avant-garde
|