It wasn’t the waiting room anyway, it was in his small office…
Doug
On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Max Richards <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> title already taken by Elizabeth Bishop so not suitable unless there’s a connection…
>
> Max
>
> On Jun 12, 2015, at 16:36, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> or 'In the Waiting Room'?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Jun 2015, at 1:07 am, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably ‘In the Examination Room.’
>>>
>>> Or’In the Doctor’s office.’
>>>
>>> Along those lines, I guess….
>>>
>>> Doug
>>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd like a title, Doug. Much richer for the contextualising.
>>>>
>>>> Bill
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Jun 2015, at 2:45 am, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose I could title it, Max…
>>>>>
>>>>> Doug
>>>>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Max Richards <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> aha thanks Doug, that was one of my guesses…
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a rich matter which may make more impact on more readers if you now add a few words…no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best from Max in Seattle
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 7:49, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking at an old machine in a doctor’s office, Bill. The rest was nicely up-to-date or, as he said, works too well to get a new one, but I was staring at that one piece, &….
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We, on the other hand, may keep getting better (or manage at least to maintain)…
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doug
>>>>>>>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 1:34 AM, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mm sad state of the arts, Doug. Does all ageing have to be sad? Not according to Max's spring rambles. What manner of patients might these be I wonder?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bill
>>>>>>>>> On 11/06/2015, at 1:50 AM, Douglas Barbour wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> State of the Art
>>>>>>>>> but decades ago
>>>>>>>>> sad state seen now
>>>>>>>>> aging faster than
>>>>>>>>> the patients
>>>>>>>>> (be patient) it must seem
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this riddle of progress
>>>>>>>>> unanswered still
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Douglas Barbour
>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
>>>>>>>>> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no life that does not rise
>>>>>>>>> melodic from scales of the marvelous.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To which our grief refers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Robert Duncan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Douglas Barbour
>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
>>>>>>> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no life that does not rise
>>>>>>> melodic from scales of the marvelous.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To which our grief refers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Robert Duncan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Barbour
>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>
>>>>> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
>>>>> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no life that does not rise
>>>>> melodic from scales of the marvelous.
>>>>>
>>>>> To which our grief refers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert Duncan.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Douglas Barbour
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
>>> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>>>
>>> There is no life that does not rise
>>> melodic from scales of the marvelous.
>>>
>>> To which our grief refers.
>>>
>>> Robert Duncan.
>>>
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
There is no life that does not rise
melodic from scales of the marvelous.
To which our grief refers.
Robert Duncan.
|