Hi Corey, Karen,
This is to ask you about the status of
[
ACTION: Corey and Karen to write up cases of validation with de-referencing or local caches, to be sent to W3C
Corey: I thought we had done.
... I had drafted something during a meeting
... I thought it had been sent and they were not very interested
... I will ask Karen for confirmation.
]
We still have R-171 [1] and R-171bis [2], but I believe none of these were what Corey was after the last time [3]. It would be a pity to lose an important requirement.
Apparently Corey had written a short description at [4]
[
My question for the W3C group is whether their definition of "instance data" includes local caches of remote resources. Example of LCSH on id.loc.gov. Over 480,000 skos concepts represented, of which I may need 10,000 in a local system, so I will use a separate triplestore or something like Linked Data Fragments to cache. I have validation needs around dereferencing these and confirming their shape. I also potentially have a validation need on when my cache is invalid .
-- Partial answer: there is great discussion about how the Shapes standard will define the extent of the graph over which validation will take place. There is also discussion about extension mechanisms, e.g. the ability to call arbitrary routines.
]
Cheers,
Antoine
[1] http://lelystad.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/rdf-validation/?q=node/286
[1] http://lelystad.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/rdf-validation/?q=node/455
[3] https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/dcmi-ap-23-04-2015
[4] https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/dcmi-ap-09-04-2015
|