Hi Lars,
Thanks for the answer!
June 18 would be alright.
As far as I can tell the group doesn't have an official input on your question.
Truth is, there was no champion for making that issue explicit - or it was forgotten in the maelstrom of new requirements that came after and/or merged with them.
This is indeed quite ironic, given the original context for the group's creation.
But if you submit some description of the case, we'd be certainly happy to oblige add it to our lists!
Best,
Antoine
On 5/22/15 10:31 AM, Svensson, Lars wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
>> In the past two weeks there's been a discussion about Linked Data Profiles on
>> the W3C public linked open data list:
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015May/thread.html ("Profiles
>> in Linked Data")
>>
>> It looks relevant, and it's a very long thread!
>
> Yes I started that thread with the goal of finding consensus on how clients and servers can negotiate profiles (or shapes or whatever-we-prefer-to-call-them). The use case I have is the provision of bibliographic data in several "profiles", e. g. BIBFRAME, RDA/FRBR, etc. There hasn't been a clear answer yet...
>
>> Lars, you have started it, would it be possible for you to report on it in one of
>> the coming bi-weekly calls of the RDF AP group?
>
> I could present/report on June 18 if that is a suitable date. June 4 is a public holiday in this part of Germany so I shall not be able to attend that meeting.
>
>> At the call today, we were quite curious to hear whether you think there's
>> something we should do!
>
> If I remember correctly, Kai kicked off this working group after my presentation at SWIB in 2013 where I mentioned the need for profile negotiation, so perhaps I should ask the wg members if you have any input!
>
> Best,
>
> Lars
>
>
|