JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  May 2015

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING May 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Back to contemporary process-based art

From:

Stephanie Rothenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stephanie Rothenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 12 May 2015 15:49:10 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (104 lines)

Hi everyone!

Thanks to Juliette for initiating this conversation and to those who have
responded thus far. I'm excited to be part of Juliette's curatorial project
on artists' process on the Streaming Museum.

What first came to mind after reading through the thread is the keynote
lecture at the 2011 ISEA Istanbul by curator Christiane Paul. As part of
her talk, Paul gave a vivid visual chronology of the history of net art
that was quite a different experience than when reading about it. The
physical experience of viewing early projects by artists/collectives such
as jodi.org or Galloway's "Carnivore" to more recent work such as
echoarttech's "Untitled Landscape #5" for the Whitney Artport
Sunrise/Sunset commissions in a fast paced stimulating presentation
underscored the criticality of the medium at that moment in time in
relation to the artist's concept.

Sitting through Paul's presentation I realized I was having a visceral
response to what Bruce calls the evolutionary/revolutionary impact of the
technology. Being "older than Jesus," and having experienced these advances
first hand, especially with virtual environments being a "post" Second
Lifer, the presentation triggered the embodied experiences I had with these
emerging technologies over the past 15 years.

This is what I feel distinguishes the process of artists using technology
vs artists using more traditional process techniques. Of course I'm not
saying there isn't an embodied type of experience a painter has when
painting to the lusciousness and perceptual phenomena of let's say oil
paint. It's just different, and primarily due to the fact that most of
these technologies (smart devices, the cnc of our home printers) are being
used daily for purposes other than the aesthetic or social commentary.

This relates to the conceptual aspect of the artists work surveyed in
Paul's presentation. As mentioned, the timeliness of the artist using that
particular technology is critical. The work's "curatorial" dissemination
must happen almost simultaneously with its mainstreaming. We see this with
early jodi.org works as well as with more recent projects such as Marisa
Jahn's "Nanny Van" -- how her tactical media approach impacts in real time
the cell phone user behaviors of a particular demographic (the nannies).

And what happens with works that repurpose older technologies such as
Lovid? How do their live performances reengage particular sensations and
memories of the viewer's past with those technologies?

A great conversation between Hito Steyerl and Laura Poitras on their
artistic process using technology and its dissemination to the public is
explored further in a recent artforum post:
https://artforum.com/inprint/issue=201505&id=51563

Looking forward to hearing more...

Best,
Stephanie


-- 
Stephanie Rothenberg
Associate Professor
Department of Art, SUNY Buffalo
[log in to unmask]
–––––
www.stephanierothenberg.com

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Xiaoying YUAN <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for your prompt feedback!
> I appreciate your suggestion of shortening my post on our panel. I decided
> to share your advice here openly so our contributors will not make the same
> "mistake" like me!
> It's hard to pack a dozen of ideas and viewpoints into a short email here,
> indeed. I feel challenged by my posting experience on CRUMB, but meanwhile,
> this is an excellent training to shape me into an efficient writer online!
> So to follow up with your post:
> Thank you very much for sharing your daily drawing experience. It is truly
> an incredible creative process that you take on; and it's true that it's
> entirely open-ended and no more time-based, with the production of a series
> of objects that can be explored as both final exhibit and prototypes for
> new objects' making.
> Bruce has said that "it is difficult to pin down an exact definition of
> 'process-based art' because it is in the process of defining itself," and
> "the fundamental issue is the contrast between the art object and the
> aesthetic experience of this form of art."
> I'd like to challenge the difficulty now by pointing out a few
> characteristics that I consider part of the criteria for the definition on
> "contemporary process-based art": the creative process doesn't take the
> object making as the final goal, is no more time based, and the exhibiting
> space is broadened to the entire human life and society.
> I welcome your feedback on my points.
>
> Many thanks!
>
>
> Xiaoying Juliette Yuan 袁晓萦
> Media Arts Curator
> Visiting Scholar NYU Steinhardt
> Department of Music and Performing Arts Professions
> 35 West 4th Street, 10th Floor
> New York, NY 10012
> http://julietteyuan.net
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager