JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  May 2015

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING May 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Issues surrounding "process-based art"

From:

Laura Blereau <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Laura Blereau <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 31 May 2015 23:01:25 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (22 lines)

Hello! Thank you, Juliette, for all the interesting contributions and questions posed in this thread. This past month I've enjoyed reading the responses, while keeping pace with the schedule of art fairs, events and exhibitions presented in New York at bitforms gallery. If it's not too late, I'd like to address the Beryl's question of how art historical trajectories are engaged by new media collection practices at major museums. 

Every institution approaches and defines contemporary art differently, and has a unique way of supporting art that relies on software or machines. Some organizations have huge budgets for collections and research, while others possess wonderful exhibition spaces, or technical knowledge. But still overall, there are huge gaps in education at museums when it comes presenting and conserving new media art - and that's because the language and story of technology evolves independently from the narrative of art history.

The artists and galleries who are commercially successful at museums (and with donors to museums) play an active role in educating their clients. This entails a practical acknowledgement of the strengths and weaknesses of their dynamic mediums. More importantly, there is an attempt to fill the knowledge gap between the two trades/histories, but in a way that is meaningful for the specific craft/artwork under consideration. I think solo exhibitions pose the greatest long-term opportunity for critical study of this genre, as they can best facilitate collections and focused preservation of the art objects. The conversations with museums are most productive when considering one object or artist at a time.

Working with museum collections is the most efficient way that an artist can seriously impact how we push forward the greater conversation of a technological avant-garde, and where that sits relative to histories of painting, film/video, performance, sculpture, etc. It impacts what the public later will see and study, but only if the project is well-documented when acquired. When sold, it is the responsibility of the artist and gallery to provide strong records of past exhibition, interpretation, and behavior, as well as recommendations for future care/presentation (be the artwork defined as a process or otherwise). With that said, the Museum of Modern Art in NY recently acquired by “Pulse Room” (2006) by Rafael Lozano-Hemmer, and I think you'll agree that documentation for this project (and how it addresses "process") speaks for itself:
http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/pulse_room.php

Laura
…………………………………….

Laura Blereau
Director
bitforms gallery
131 Allen Street, NY NY 10002
212.366.6939
[log in to unmask]
www.bitforms.com 

May 13 - Jul 1: Daniel Rozin "Descent with Modification"

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager