> On 29 May 2015, at 14:12, Mike Ellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> FWIW I'd be happy to host / pay for development / feed into this kind of approach. If anyone else is interested please feel free to ping me. I'll probably do it anyway, even if no one agrees
I’m interested in this simplified approach, even if all we agree upon is a minimum viable metadata per object format…
e.g. what fields, what labels and what is the minimum metadata for an object to qualify as catalogued.
I have several applications where a single, simple standard for MVM would be welcome.
:o)
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|