Thanks, Eric. This fits in with a lot of what we're already doing here.
I took a quick look at the questionnaire... it's pretty darn nerdish.
But it gives me an idea, if you don't mind us stealing yours, which is
that DCMI (which is working now to come up with a set of "core"
validation requirements) could do a "plain language" questionnaire for
our GLAM colleagues on validation needs. That would also help us define
our priorities.
kc
On 4/15/15 10:09 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> In some Mayo grant work, I have prepared a questionnaire on the
> expressivity of shape expressions. It presents a high-level language
> for expressing RDF constraints, explains a number of the technical
> points, and asks the user for which features and technical approaches
> are important to their work and their view of what will make the
> language successful. There are a couple places where you can click for
> extra geekiness, in case the baseline geekiness was insufficient.
>
> I'd like people to fill out the form imagining their immediate uses
> for RDF validation as well as those that may come with new markets
> enabled by the existence of such RDF validating tooling. The form will
> record your results whenever you hit submit so you can easily revisit
> your answers after reflection.
>
> This work is supported in part by a NIH U01 grant – caCDE-QA
> (1U01CA180940-01A1).
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|