Evelyn, thanks for this. I'm going to include it in our discussion of
"what is core in our requirements" --
kc
On 4/9/15 2:25 AM, Evelyn Dröge wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry but I cannot attempt the call today. However, when we are thinking
> about our next steps I would like to point to our collection of ideas
> that we have made a couple of months ago:
> http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/requirements_next_steps
>
> If I am not wrong, we have for example not defined yet what an RDF AP
> is. This could be a good thing to work on. Maybe you have time to take a
> quick look on the list of ideas during the call.
>
> Cheers
> Evelyn
>
>
>
> Am 08.04.2015 um 14:24 schrieb Karen Coyle:
>> We have a meeting scheduled for Thursday, 9 am EDT, 15:00 CET
>>
>> The agenda is at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/dcmi-ap-09-04-2015
>>
>> The Webex call-in is
>> https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=MDAL0I2WSSY4CQBPV7OKXPJGYL-JV0D&rnd=101606.78946
>>
>>
>> Although we have an agenda, it seems to me that our main next step is
>> to decide what we will do next. Thomas has taken a look at the
>> BIBFRAME AP and provided a brief analysis:
>>
>> http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/RDF_Application_Profiles/BibframeAnalysis
>>
>>
>> I had begun an attempt to do a re-write of the DCMI DSP that did not
>> use the terms from the DCAM (which I believe were a deterrent to
>> acceptance), as well as an analysis of missing functionality:
>>
>> http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/RDF_Application_Profiles/DSPanalysis
>>
>> Look at these and think about whether we can continue on in one of
>> these directions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> kc
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|