JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  April 2015

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES April 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Wood ash / Allotment BaP

From:

"Taylor, Christopher" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Taylor, Christopher

Date:

Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:31:52 +0000

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines) , Double ratio plots.JPG (1 lines)

Right, I have done the double ratio plots, and the source is coal derived. I have attached the plot.



This must be a legacy of historic practices, as I don't know of any plot holders who bring ash from their fireplaces/coal burning stoves to their allotments. Just how persistent are PAHs in soil that is regularly worked for growing veg? 



Also, plant derived ash is definitely present, but if the PAHs detected in the lab analysis are coal derived, does this imply that the PAH concentrations of the wood ash are negligible in comparison, i.e. do  we have a mixture of the two ash types where a dominant more highly concentrated coal derived PAH is dominating the results?



This is all I have found on the composition of wood ash, from the following paper: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/use_of_ash_in_forestry.pdf/$FILE/use_of_ash_in_forestry.pdf (thanks to Jonathan Parry for the link)



Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

Data quoted by Someshwar from Diebel et al. (1992) indicate that the types of PAHs found in wood ash are

those of the two and three ring constituents, which are less toxic than the four and five ring compounds.

Naphthalene proved the most plentiful in his study (1.6 mg/kg), but many compounds were below detection

levels in the samples. In a recent study in Switzerland wood ash derived from a pure burn at 550 – 650 ºC was

added to mineral soils, and monitored for both PAH and PCB compounds (Bundt et al., 2001). The wood ash

was found to have high concentrations of PAHs (the sum of 20 types equated to 16.8 mg/kg). However, the

PCB addition to soils from the wood ash was low (totalling 14 types which equated to 3.4μg/kg) . The exact

nature of the wood burned was not recorded. 



I imagine that the temperature of the fire, type and age of plant material etc, all have a role to play in the PAH composition. Seems like a great MSc/PhD project to investigate the PAH composition of purely plant derived ash. 





Regards



Christopher Taylor

Enforcement Officer

Regulatory Services

Brent Council



Tel: 020 8937 5159



www.brent.gov.uk 







-----Original Message-----

From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Russell Corbyn

Sent: 23 April 2015 16:28

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Wood ash / Allotment BaP



Now there is a sensible scientific approach, not just an idea!



Not that they (double ratio plots) are at exceptionally accurate but there are so many other sources of deposition for PAHs and their attachment to fugitive dusts from exhausts, fire depositions, weathered macadam dust, spilt oils and so on. They are ubiquitous and it would give an approximation and the grouping of data would become immediately apparent.



I now have several hundred macadam PAH analyses and there is good agreement with the vast majority of data. It also becomes apparent what level of PAH is noise. With the levels of most environmental soil PAH analysis being quite noisy due to the distribution being in reality quite close to the limit of detection of tests (and let us not forget the lab error bars that must be applied to that) I feel sure that there would be substantially more noise than in my macadam samples.



I don't like the "let's just look at BaP level" approach to PAH provenance assessment because it is a very narrow view and tells us not very much.



Cheers



Russell







-----Original Message-----

From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark Henderson

Sent: 23 April 2015 11:42

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Wood ash / Allotment BaP



It would be interesting to see the whole BaP set with  fluoranthene, pyrene, BaA and chrysene. You could then plug them into a double ratio plot and see if they point to a single source.



Just an idea



Regards

 

Mark C Henderson BSc(Hons) MSc DIC MIEnvSc Technical Director

Mobile: 07736 058 007

Office: 01223 632800

Email: [log in to unmask]

W: www.mlm.uk.com 

 

M L M

Buildings and Infrastructure ∙ Environment Planning and Development ∙ Compliance ∙ Sustainability

 

Follow us online:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mlmgrp

Twitter: https://twitter.com/mlm_group

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/company/mlm-group 

 

Emails are sent on behalf of the MLM company which is named in the relevant signed appointment or if none exists, in our fee proposal or (if MLM is acting as client) in our order. Companies Act information for MLM Group companies is available at http://www.mlm.uk.com/about_company.php.



-----Original Message-----

From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Taylor, Christopher

Sent: 23 April 2015 07:57

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Wood ash / Allotment BaP



Hi Chris



Sure. Here are the BaP results from 7 random allotments.



3.44	17.70	26.30	5.97	7.20	2.93	9.45	15.12	12.25	14.73																		

1.58	2.17	0.64	2.56	3.20	7.14	2.85	0.85	0.85	6.37																		

0.83	<0.05	<0.05	0.98	8.72	0.59	3.47	0.32	3.16	0.70																		

3.48	1.87	5.40	2.54	3.71	2.34	0.67	8.56	1.73	1.96	2.02	11.67	2.52	10.86														

2.69	1.95	8.11	12.43	7.73	0.58	8.99	8.69	14.17	5.65	3.56	5.86	3.32	3.62	7.46	6.13	7.63	6.54	9.59	3.52	3.20	3.78	0.83	7.42	4.74	3.55	9.95	4.19

3.60	3.13	5.33	5.13	3.96																							

1.02	0.99	1.38	2.32	1.02	2.44	2.44	3.16																				





Regards



Christopher Taylor

Enforcement Officer

Regulatory Services

Brent Council



Tel: 020 8937 5159



www.brent.gov.uk 





-----Original Message-----

From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Dainton

Sent: 22 April 2015 23:33

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Wood ash / Allotment BaP



Neil & Chris



Can you share the BaP results (just the numbers will do) from the allotment testing you've undertaken so the List can get a feel of the range of BaP numbers encountered, rather than just min - max etc.



Cheers



Chris Dainton



--

The use of Brent Council's e-mail system may be monitored and communications read in order to secure effective operation of the system and other lawful purposes.



If you have received this transmission in error, we apologise. Please notify us immediately and permanently delete this message, keeping its contents confidential. We monitor email correspondence for security and management purposes. We will rely on any instructions to us or data that you include in your emails. We scan emails for malicious code but you should also take steps to protect your IT systems. We will not accept email disclaimers which differ from this one.



--

The use of Brent Council's e-mail system may be monitored and communications read in order to secure effective operation of the system and other lawful purposes.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager