JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RAMESES Archives


RAMESES Archives

RAMESES Archives


RAMESES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RAMESES Home

RAMESES Home

RAMESES  March 2015

RAMESES March 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: another post Liverpool question

From:

Sonia Dalkin <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards" <[log in to unmask]>, Sonia Dalkin <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 10 Mar 2015 16:24:09 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

Hi Susan, 

I'm glad that you enjoyed the workshop, I did too! 

I've found that Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) (Checkland and Scholes, 1992) fits very well with Realist evaluation. I'm just beginning to write a journal article on this, but it may be some time before it's published. I used SSM in my thesis and hope to use it again in the future. 

SSM maps are visual tools to collect and make sense of data. They formulate carefully built models of systems which are used to represent and analyse a real world situation. The maps created are set against perceptions of the real world by a process of comparison which initiates debate between participants (Checkland and Scholes 1992). The epistemology of SSM is similar to that of realism in that the building of models accounts for the phenomenon being examined and these models are hypothetical descriptions which reveal underlying mechanisms of reality which can only be known by constructing ideas about them (Blaikie 2007).

I imagine that SSM would work equally well with Realist synthesis, in terms of mapping your programme theories and refining them. 

I'm sure others in the RAMESES group have lots of other suggestions as well. 

Best wishes, 
Sonia

Dr Sonia Dalkin
Research Fellow in Healthcare Evaluation 
School of Sociology and Social Policy 
University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9UT
0113 343 4950
Twitter: @SoniaDalkin 



-----Original Message-----
From: Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Susan Somerville (Staff)
Sent: 10 March 2015 15:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: another post Liverpool question

Hi Sue, I'd like to echo your comments regards last week's course, it was extremely helpful for me as a novice exploring Realism, so thanks especially to Justin for sharing your expertise, and also to Sonia Dalkin who's knowledge and experience we benefitted from.

My questions which Justin encouraged me to post is following on from a discussion that arose last week which was about using other methodologies to pursue a study after a Realist Synthesis - do some/any other methodologies work within or alongside realist methodology?   Which other methodologies do or not 'fit', and as we discussed last week Realism uses retroduction so if other  methodologies use retroduction, is this the key to the 'fit'?

Kind regards,
Susan
University of Dundee


-----Original Message-----
From: Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Suemann
Sent: 09 March 2015 13:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Mechanisms in realist evaluation of systems

First to say thank you to justin Jagosh for very stimulating course in liverpool last week - and for inspiring me to be brave enough to post here.

I am a relatively new recruit to realism and have been plunged into a complex realist evaluation of a health systems research project designed to design, implement and evaluate a range of (different) post partum care packages in four African countries.  I am drawing  on trish  greenhalgh's methodology for evaluating the south london modernisation initiative.  I have found the approach of looking at supportive/ unsupportive contexts for the mechanisms fits well here but I am unsure how the overarching selected mechanisms for systems are related to the way we look at individual level evaluations and individual level reactions such as fear, empowerment or motivation etc.
Can anyone advise ( I hope this makes sense!).

Finally to say we are starting a small skype-based journal club as a way of building skills for some of us earlier on in using the methodology.  If any of you experts out there would be happy to join us occasionally that would be fantastic.

Thanks for any help

Best wishes
Sue Mann
UCL NIHR knowledge mobilisation fellow

Sent from my iPhone

The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager