On 2015-03-02 11:36, Suzanne Hardy wrote:
> This is less about the photographer waiving their moral rights, and
> about thinking of the rights of the children, and relating that to
> issues of what constitutes explicit consent, which relates to the the
> Data Protection Act 1998, where Schedule 2 and Schedule 3 set out the
> conditions relevant for the processing of any personal data. In this
> case because of the use of images of children, this is less related to
> the Copyright Designs and Patents Act than to the processing of
> personal data where explicit consent is required.
>
> BBC editorial guidelines are pretty good in this area:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/page/guidance-children-full
Did a google (out of curiosity), as I was wondering how "identifiable"
someone had to be, and what sort of defence this is for public buildings
and spaces.
https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/schools/photos/
So guessing it is where personal use ends? Is putting some on flickr
personal use? Does the cc licensing revoke the personal use?
|