JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Archives


CAPITAL-AND-CLASS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS Home

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS  March 2015

CAPITAL-AND-CLASS March 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

CFP INSEP2015 – Violence, Representations and Sexuality

From:

Paul reynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul reynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:56:28 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

CFP INSEP2015 – Violence, Representations and Sexuality
Fifth International Conference of the
International Network for Sexual Ethics and Politics ‐ INSEP
13th ‐ 15th July, 2015, Ghent University, Belgium
Hosted by CEVI – Centre for Ethics and Value Inquiry
Faculty of Arts and Philosophy
Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2
9000 Ghent – Belgium
http://www.insep.ugent.be/insep2015/
General Conference Theme – Violence, Representations and Sexuality
The relationship between violence and sexuality is one of the most critical areas of engagement for
sex and sexuality research and activism. There continues to be an epidemic of violence against
women and children – rape, sexual assault, sexual harassment and abuse – across the globe,
manifest in different cultural customs and practices, authority structures, hetero‐patriarchal and
hetero‐normative regimes at both national (and supranational in the case of trafficking) and
everyday micro levels. This epidemic is often met with: limited regulatory responses suffused with
heterosexist assumptions; legal authorities that fail to prioritise or regard it is less important than
other criminal activity; indifference; and/or claims that the prevalent cultural milieu makes it
impossible to act. While some efforts have been made in North America, Europe and Australasia to
effect change, in many parts of the globe sexual subjection and suffering continues to be seen as a
normal state of affairs.
Equally, across the globe sexual difference and departures from heterosexuality are met by varying
degrees of violence, ranging from physical attack and murder, to prejudicial and pathological
assumptions that are present even in the social context of equality and rights discourses. To be
different is still to be ‘othered’ to varying degrees, and that ‘othering’ often takes damaging forms of
practice against those who present themselves as different.
The cultural and representational contexts are of particular importance here. It is in the
representational form that we most saliently see the cultural demarcations of legitimacy and
illegitimacy for sex and sexuality. Through representations, tensions are played out in the public
arena that are sometimes manifest only in inter‐subjective or hetero‐normative meaning making. In
societies where gay men and lesbians are formally recognised, there remains a dichotomy between
the ‘respectable’ different that operates within homonormative constraints and lives without
troubling heteronormative assumption, and the ‘queer’ whose personal practices challenge or
disrupt cultural and social norms as a feature of being themselves. Likewise, the representation of
sex in mainstream medias often reinforces particular understandings and meanings suffused with
power, presumption and prejudice. Against that, alternate forms of media can play an important
role in promote constructive understandings of the relationship between desire, pleasure and
healthy satisfaction.
Violence and sexuality also creates a nexus of troubling contradictions. Recently, the fetishisation of
‘Fifty Shades of Grey’, e.g., normalises a commodified and limited exploration of sexual imagination,
whilst BDSMers and others who wish to move beyond difference as an adjunct to genito‐centric and
penetrative sex remain culturally prejudiced against and subject to different and sometimes
punishing pathologies and legal regulatory regimes. Pornography and prostitution represent other
2
areas of contestation. Is pornography or prostitution inherently violent? Or is there room for
sufficient levels of agency and choice?
The juxtaposition of pain, violence and sex, whether in practice or in representation, whether
consenting or not, splits those radical voices who often support sexual freedom. Does violence and
sexuality represent a fault‐line for disagreement? Is that disagreement one of language and
representation or of power, degradation and its effects?
We welcome papers that explore any aspect of the relationship between violence, representation,
sexuality and sex. As always, we also welcome other papers that reflect innovative, creative and
thought‐provoking work on sexual ethics and politics in general. For this purpose we retain open
streams at the conference. Please feel free to email the conference organisers for further inquiries.
Acceptance Policy
The fifth international conference of INSEP welcomes papers, presentations and panels focusing on
conceptual and theoretical debates, cultural and political analysis and empirical studies from which
conceptual, ethical and political conclusions are drawn.
INSEP seeks to provide a critical and dynamic space for cutting edge thinking, new research and key
discussions and debates about issues of sexual ethics or politics, whether conceptual and theoretical
discourse, analytical studies or aesthetically or empirically constituted insights. INSEP sees the value
in the fullest range of approaches to the study of sexual ethics and politics, including: gendered and
feminist perspectives; distinctive lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and transsexual perspectives;
queer perspectives; and approaches from more general positions such as liberalism, Marxism and
democratic theory. The 2015 conference seeks to be an inclusive space for discussion, welcoming
dialogue and vigorous debate, but not sectarianism. We consider paper proposals and panel
proposals from any disciplinary field, and are willing to consider expositions that take less orthodox
forms.
To facilitate funding applications ‐ please note INSEP has no funds of its own ‐ we operate a 'rolling'
process of abstract review and acceptance or rejection, and can provide documentation where it is
required to facilitate funding. Our turnaround time for refereeing is 10 days.
Submission & Timeline: Submissions for papers (250 words), panels or workshops (500 word
stipulating participants) should reach us by Monday 15 June at the latest. Earlier of course, is better.
Normal acceptance/rejection notification ‐ 10 days. All delegates/paper‐givers must register by
Monday 23 June, and we encourage earlier registration when acceptances have been
communicated.
Please send abstracts to: [log in to unmask]
The conference fee for the full three days is 150 Euros, which includes the conference pack and
refreshments. A concessionary rate of 100 Euros is available to students and postgraduates.
INSEP publishes a journal and a book series with Barbara Budrich Publishers. We would anticipate
commissioning publications from the conference and, dependent on quality and coherence, may
publish a collection based on themes emerging from the conference. INSEP also welcomes
submissions to the journal and proposals to the Book Series.
3
About INSEP
Sexual ethics and politics lie at the heart of how we understand and practice our sexual lives. They
form the basis from which we understand and engage with diverse and different sexualities. Both,
however, are currently open to question. On the one hand, discussion of sexual ethics has previously
been confined to the auspices of an abstract intellectual discourse, effectively separating it from
practice. Sexual politics, on the other hand, has seen progressive advances through world‐wide
activism by grass‐roots movements, NGOs and national and international agents, but in the push for
progress, the space for self‐critique and reflexivity is often eradicated. INSEP wants to activate a
critical dialogue between sexual ethics and politics by connecting them and exploring the ways they
can contribute to each other. The sexual is political and just as sexual politics could be enriched by
emancipatory ethical thinking, sexual ethics should connect with contemporary sexual activism,
politics and practices aiming for the realisation of sexual equalities and justice.
For more info on INSEP & the 2015 conference please visit:
INSEP2015: http://www.insep.ugent.be/insep2015/
INSEP – http://www.insep.ugent.be/
Journal INSEP – http://budrich‐journals.de/index.php/insep
Paul Reynolds
Reader in Sociology and Social Philosophy
Edge Hill University, UK
[log in to unmask]
Tom Claes
Associate Professor of Ethics
Ghent University, Belgium
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager