We could look at them (pls send links) and see if anything strikes us as
being missing from our current list. After that we might answer your
question. :-)
kc
On 1/14/15 8:40 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> the DCMI AP working group is now in the last phase deriving RDF validation requirements from DC case studies and use cases.
> I think it is not too late to add your case studies to our database.
> Do others think it is worth to add these case studies to the database?
>
> You already have an account?
>
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
>
> Hello,
>
> being interested in the Application-Profiles activities from the beginning, unfortunately I didn’t find the time during the last year to actually contribute. In case it’s too late now to contribute case-studies, please just tell me. In case it’s not, I could maybe add two use cases:
>
> 1) a first one deriving from my work on the d:swarm data integration tool at SLUB Dresden, where we have a related approach to define local views on "mixed vocabulary-schemas" in our schema mapping UI (I noticed the UI-Support section is still empty)
>
> 2) a second case-study from my phd at TU Dresden where I was looking for a mechanism to prescribe the allowed use of an RDF-based vocabulary (a declarative visualization „language“ inspired by Fresnel). I collected some requirements for this some time ago after realizing that OWL is not the way to go and still I didn’t want to leave the „Semantic-Web Technological space“ and use meta-modellling, EMF etc.
>
> If you are interested in one or both case-studies or you think the second one doesn’t fit, please let me know. I just requested for an account.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jan Polowinski
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|