Thanks, Stuart. I didn't see anything come through this list about
comments, so I may not be the only one who is late in commenting.
My comment is quite simple:
regarding the properties that are "blahURL" - it seems inappropriate to
me to put "URL" in the property name. First, the object of the property
should be defined in the range, and if the range is a class, then by RDF
"rules" it is an uniform identifier. (And if you don't want to give a
specific class, you can give a range of rdfs:Class). Second, the
terminology is changing from URI to IRI, so already these property names
look a bit out of date.
I haven't had a chance to look in detail at the rest.
kc
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|