On 22 December 2014 at 10:48, Tony Marsh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thanks Dave, could you provide a link to the paper with its appendices - I
> missed it!
> Also, to others I apologise for the mangling of correct protocol by simply
> coming in after the relevant post. Some guys are so fussy. To my eye, both
> markers seem to be best labelled Moon A and Moon B. Did the keepers
> appreciate the solar system to any degree - that's doubtful isn't it?
> Best of Xmas to all, Tony
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: thomas dave
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 1:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] Stonehenge Aubrey Hole Eclipse mechanism
> Hi Tony
> if you look at appendix 2 in the paper this phenomenon is shown in
> cheery Dave
> On 21 December 2014 at 18:42, Simon B <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > At 10:25 +0000 21/12/14, Tony Marsh wrote:
> > The other is why assign the name "Sun marker" for one of the rotating
> >> attachments to the aubrey positions?
> > It's a Sun marker because the way it's moved causes it to circle the AH
> > ring completely once every year (approx). My diagrams, for simplicity,
> > start with the Sun and Moon in the AH next to the axis in the NE even
> > though the eclipse shown happens on March 20th.
> > S.