There's been a further update which seems relevant. Greenpeace are
claiming that their protest that damaged the Nazca site was overseen by
This claim doesn't seem to stand up very well - and/or the
"archaeologist's" behaviour wasn't up to the standard one might expect.
More details here:
On 16/12/2014 22:31, Michael wrote:
> There's been a bit of a stushi after Greenpeace invaded Peru's Nazca
> site and put placards linked to the Lima climate talks.
> At first I thought the protests were making a mountain out of a
> molehill, but now having seen this video:
> It does appear that long term damage has really been done - apparently
> by nothing more than walking on the site and the placement of letters.