JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  December 2014

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH December 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NICE intrapartum guidance

From:

Jenny Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>, Jenny Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:09:01 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

I find this interesting around transfer times and our medical colleague's perceptions. Over the years I have also been concerned around women 'transferring' from home when in 'active' rather than 'early' labour. This has led to the subsequent births by the roadside or in car parks that the press are so fond of but which are not places of safety. The logic to me has always been to me if in 'active' labour stay put and call a midwife to the home and then 'transfer' if required. Rather than 'call a midwife' it has become 'call the hospital' who invariably seem to say 'come in'.
something else for the mix...
best wishes
Jenny

Dr Jenny Hall
Senior Midwifery Lecturer
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences
Bournemouth University

Find me on twitter at hallmum5
________________________________________
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Louise Silverton [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 09 December 2014 11:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NICE intrapartum guidance

Ah, how long is a piece of string?

The key issue is having transport mechanisms in place and ensuring that there are no delays in being seen on arrival at the obstetric unit. birthplace found that women transferring from home had quicker decision to transfer to being seen in the OU times than those from FMUs. Ambulance control seems to regard an FMU as a place of safety, they do not always prioritise these calls so it is vital that if there is an FMU in an area, they must prioritise calls for transfer.

It is also worth looking at reasons for transfer. Few of these could be regarded as urgent as they related to slow progress for example. As you will have seen from some letters in the press, our medical colleagues feel more supportive of alongside midwifery units than freestanding ones or home birth due to the issue of transfer. What is not said is that for a woman labouring at home her transfer to an OU for slow progress is no different from a similar woman travelling there with her partner in early labour. It is still a transfer.  Should women spend the the last trimester in an OU to avoid the need to transfer? This is the corollary of some medical views as is assuming that care in hospital is safe but there is a question mark of other places for birth.

Anecdotal experience tells me that delays in transfer relate to the following:
1 timely decisions to transfer
2 having transfer mechanisms set up in advance with ambulance service
3 speedy assessment on arrival in OU

Our colleagues in alongside units also experience delays with transfer due to lack of space in the OU (esp if transfer not urgent) or delays in being seen by an obstetrician after transfer.

Hope this helps

Louise

Sent from my iPad

> On 9 Dec 2014, at 05:27, "Pauley Tara (HINCHINGBROOKE HEALTH CARE NHS TRUST)" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> A question has been raised on the Facebook group "Research Midwives" page.
>
> ********************************************************************************************************************
>
> This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the
> sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
> to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Thank you for your co-operation.
>
> NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland
> NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
> NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere
>
> ********************************************************************************************************************
> <image.png>
>
>
> Can anyone aid in responding to Karen's question about "timely access"?
>
> With Kind Regards
> Tara Pauley BSc (Hons)BA (Hons)
> Research Midwife
> MPhil/PhD Student - Applied Social & Health Psychology
>
> @researchMWs
>
> 01480 354967/07952 409131.
> (sent from iPhone)
>

BU is a Disability Two Ticks Employer and has signed up to the Mindful Employer charter. Information about the accessibility of University buildings can be found on the BU DisabledGo webpages [ http://www.disabledgo.com/en/org/bournemouth-university ]
This email is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email, which must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Bournemouth University or its subsidiary companies. Nor can any contract be formed on behalf of the University or its subsidiary companies via email.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager