Yes, but I'm not going down there if that cyberman is still down there....
Development Management Group
North Somerset Council
Our Historic Environment Record is now on-line: Go to the North Somerset web site (http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk) then use the tabs Environment / Conservation / Archaeology/ Historic Environment Record. Enjoy! Please note the change in my landline AND my mobile numbers.
Landline: 01934 426256
Please note my work hours are usually 8am to 4pm
From: British archaeology discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Wood
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: expensive Lunar Mission One
Of course to contemplate digging a hole into the middle of the henge
monument might upset English Heritage as well as a lot of others.
However with a bit of lateral, pardon the expression, thinking one
could perhaps bypass, again pardon the expression, EH by tunnelling
into the middle of the site from the proposed road tunnel.
This would be a hit with Whovians as there was a storyline a few years
ago with a chamber under the rocks which too became an attraction
aliens but more importantly it would give an added popular reason to
dig the road tunnel.
Think of it a bit like the Olympic Games. Everyone tunes in for the
Opening and Closing Ceremonies but very few actually watch the
So if you want to fund something that is unjustifiably expensive just
add something with glitz and razzamatazz then people will mindlessly
chuck money at you.
The funds raised could be used to help to support the cost of the road
tunnel, or even pay it outright, with oodles left over for some decent
On 11/24/14, Orion <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Do you realise how great an idea you are proposing?
> What an amazing potential.
> Think of how many out there who will jump at the chance for a measure of
> Suppose you offer any contributor to provide a dvd disc with whatever she
> wants on it along with a financial contribution. The disc will be included
> with what ever hardware will be needed and will be recovered by some future
> archaeologist in about 5000 years.
> A chamber deep in the chalk that will hold as much information as will fit
> and set to open itself in the year 7014.
> Imagine how many wealthy persons will pay dearly to have their DNA
> Suppose the world leaders manage to accomplish what they seem to be hell
> bent on doing and we wind up back in the stone age. A timecap will be most
> welcome to our descendants 250 generations hence.
> Look at what the Pharaohs invested to preserve their remains. Who knows
> what capabilities will exist in 5000 years?
> John, this can raise millions, maybe hundreds of millions (billions?).
> Rockhenge is the ideal spot.
> Think about it and do it.
> Maybe Cerri and Michael will help sell the idea. It may even be time to
> in touch with Paul Barford.
> Your idea is sensible and practical. There is a company raking in millions
> selling stars. They send me offers that for $54 US they will name a star
> after me ;)
> Imagine that - a star named Orion.
> At 12:22 PM 11/22/2014 +0000, you wrote:
>>Here is a valid reason to plant a time capsule at Rockhenge next year. To
>>commemorate the 250th anniversary of William Stukeley's death in 1765.
>>On 22 Nov 2014 12:04, "John Wood" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Cerri, of course to really kickstart such a project it would be ideal to
>>> gain royal patronage. Prince Edward would probably be the most obvious
>>> choice as he has dabbled in archaeology, is the Earl of Wessex and
>>> looks good in a druidical gown.
>>> On 22 Nov 2014 09:44, "Cerridwen Connelly" <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> The Stonehenge timecap is a superb idea! If I hadn't reigned from the
>>>> management committee several years ago I would bring it up at the next
>>>> meeting. Could someone here contact the EH management chairman and
>>>> it go on the agenda?
>>>> I vaguely recall this being discussed about a decade ago. Not sure if
>>>> something was actually planted there or not.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:41 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] expensive Lunar Mission One
>>>> On 21/11/2014 22:28, John Wood wrote:
>>>>>> Perhaps we could boldly go where no man has gone before, and make a
>>>>>> for British archaeology too!
>>>>>> I am sure loads of people would pay to have something personal put
>>>>>> time capsule on the moon but I bet they would be equally compelled if
>>>>>> instead one was buried under the centre of Rockhenge.
>>>>>> As we all know if aliens are going to land anywhere, at anytime, in
>>>>>> future it is more than likely it will be at Rockhenge. Or at least it
>>>>>> wouldn't be too difficult to make willing donors think such!
>>>>>>At 10:41 PM 11/21/2014 +0000,Michael wrote:
>>>>>> That's an excellent idea.
Keeping in touch
Visit www.n-somerset.gov.uk for information about our services
Council Connect: for all streets, open spaces and environmental protection enquiries visit www.n-somerset.gov.uk/connect
Care Connect: for all adult social services enquiries visit www.n-somerset.gov.uk/careconnect
Out of hours emergencies: 01934 622 669
Privacy and confidentiality notice:
The information contained in this email transmission is intended by North Somerset Council for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you have received this email transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email. Any views expressed within this message or any other associated files are the views and expressions of the individual and not North Somerset Council. North Somerset Council takes all reasonable precautions to ensure that no viruses are transmitted with any electronic communications sent, however the council can accept no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or any contents or attachments.