Moving away from the practicalities; I'm still reeling from the disappointment that we didn't have a Moonbase Alpha and a fleet of Eagles by 1999 ;-)
At least the moon's still in orbit...
From: British archaeology discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jez
Sent: 21 November 2014 13:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] expensive Lunar Mission One
Well, you have to think of all the jobs, all the R&D spin-offs, the boost to science education, and to universities...
If it costs twice as much as Rosetta, it'll be the price of two cups of coffee per person...
Excellent value, I reckon.
On 21 Nov 2014, at 09:31, Cerridwen Connelly wrote:
> With having to pay all that money to the EU, and whatnot in this country all the time, this seems an incredibly expensive idea, although nice in theory.
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.