That is interesting thanks. We see about 5% in prompt reco (nearest
thing analysis that we have run) but about a factor of 10 for merge jobs
and a factor of 2 for DigiReco of MC data.
best,
david
On 24/10/14 16:55, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> I can find out more in detail but for obvious reasons atm I remember
> only ATLAS and they observed ~10-15% less efficiency in analysis jobs,
> production was fine instead.
>
> On 24/10/2014 16:34, David Colling wrote:
>> So what do they say? Could you point to any links that might have either
>> presentations or minuted comments?
>>
>> Who reports from CMS on this? As far as I know none of the people who
>> know about the testing within CMS go to WLCG Ops meetings.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> david
>>
>> On 24/10/14 14:48, Alessandra Forti wrote:
>>> All experiments are testing Wigner, there are often reports at the WLCG
>>> Ops Coordination meetings.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> alessandra
>>>
>>> On 24/10/2014 14:24, David Colling wrote:
>>>> First my apologies for missing the technical meeting. It turns out that
>>>> Starbucks network and Vidyo are not compatible...
>>>>
>>>> The second thing is a question that I would have asked if they had
>>>> been.
>>>> What are Atlas and LHCbs experiences of using Wigner? We are doing lots
>>>> of testing in CMS with very mixed results.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> david
>
|