Phil, in that case why not just say it's 'a site showing evidence for transient or temporary occupation' - why does it need to be contrasted with another type of site in terms of the 'sufficiency' of the evidence?
I don't think I'm reading too much into it but perhaps like Madox in The English Patient, 'It comes from too long having to read so much into hardly anything at all'!
Thanks everyone for their contributions this morning.
Jonathan
|