And I guess that's the difficulty with dealing with large institutions - individuals are limited as to the agreements they can make and how much power they have over prices to be paid, timing etc. Might be worth having the conversation with AJ though and seeing what response we get. Thanks for your explanation Carla - helpful to know what has happened in the past.
Sharon
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Oct 2014, at 22:38, "Leo Clarey" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> HI Carla,
>
> Just chipping in briefly - Issues like this always go over my head, but basically negotiations of this type are all handled by the Centralized Bibliographical Services (CBS) department here at UAL, so ultimately I would not be qualified to venture further. Any negotiations would have to involve my CBS colleagues extensively.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Leo Clarey
> Academic Support Librarian
> London College of Communication Library
> Elephant & Castle
> London
> SE1 6SB
>
> Tel.: 020 7514 6875
>
> www.arts.ac.uk/library
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Architecture Librarians group [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Carla Marchesan [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 08 October 2014 13:48
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Message to list re: AJ
>
> Dear Sharon and all,
>
> In our initial negotiations we used the argument that by giving access to AJBL we were cultivating their clients of the future, and indeed it is a strong argument, however, what they were really interested in was that our group represents the majority of architecture Schools in the UK, and the possibility of all, or the majority, to subscribe to their product.
>
> Their post-negotiations offer had time and numbers constrictions, they wanted us to sign shortly after their presentation at our conference, and they wanted a minimum of 75% of ARCLIB academic member institutions to sign in order to offer us a group deal, which at the time was a flat £1000 + VAT with IP access, to raise only to keep up with inflation/cost of living every year.
> This was quite a drop from the initial institutional offer of £3000 + VAT per year.
>
> Because the deadline was too near for most institutions to sign up, we managed to have a few months delay, but I'm afraid, even so, very few institutions were interested, and only 2 or 3 signed up at the group negotiated price. We indicated that deadlines don't work, and they still offered the negotiated deal to the 2 or 3 institutions who subscribed, even if it was passed the deadline. Our strength in numbers for the negotiation proved inconclusive.
>
> In general, it has proven difficult to get a response form AJ, and different people had different experiences, also, it has proven difficult for member institutions to share details of their negotiations with AJ with other members, and there might have been at least one institution that subscribed at whatever price was asked.
>
> All in all, to negotiate a group deal we would need consensus 1) that we will not undertake a subscription other than at the price and conditions we agree, 2) the majority of member academic institutions, and 75% is a good indication, undertake to subscribe within a time frame.
> Without these, we do not have much negotiating power, especially if they look at the numbers who subscribed at the original post conference special group offer.
>
> Saying this, it might still be possible to persuade them to agree with us an open deal for any member institution, not on the strength of the number of our academic institutional members, but just on the strength that any subscribing institution will forge their future customers.
>
> Any volunteers for the negotiator role?
>
> All the best,
> Carla
>
> Carla Marchesan
> Librarian, Tutor & ARCLIB Chair
> D +44 (0)20 7613 8507
>
> The Prince's Foundation & Prince's School of Traditional Arts
> 19-22 Charlotte Road, London EC2A 3SG
> T +44 (0)20 7613 8500
> www.princes-foundation.org & http://www.psta.org.uk/
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Architecture Librarians group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sharon Laverick
> Sent: 08 October 2014 08:50
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Message to list re: AJ
>
> Might there be a further opportunity for negotiation of a group discount? It seems most unfair to go back on an agreement - not that we had taken this up. AJBL has developed into a really important resource but one students may want to continue to use beyond uni - so it's in EMAPs interest to encourage their use whilst students.
>
> Sharon Laverick
>
>> On 26 Sep 2014, at 14:59, "Carla Marchesan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Lucy.
>> I'm forwarding the reply David had from AJ :
>>
>> "We have stopped all third party deals and content aggregator deals with all EMAP brands as of June, completely finishing up at the end of this month. This means you can only get access directly through us."
>>
>> This might effectively also mean that our group negotiation has no validity anymore. If there were enough subscribers among ARCLIB academic member institutions we could try suggesting we withdraw all subscriptions unless they keep to the deal, but I'm afraid we don't have enough pull power.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Carla
>>
>> Carla Marchesan
>> Librarian, Tutor & ARCLIB Chair
>> D +44 (0)20 7613 8507
>>
>> The Prince's Foundation & Prince's School of Traditional Arts
>> 19-22 Charlotte Road, London EC2A 3SG
>> T +44 (0)20 7613 8500
>> www.princes-foundation.org & http://www.psta.org.uk/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Architecture Librarians group
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lunt, Tracey
>> Sent: 26 September 2014 14:14
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Message to list re: AJ
>>
>> Out of interest, we are trialling the AJBL again, and have also just trialled Phaidon Atlas. I need to get feedback, and our prices won't tally with the majority of you due to us being a ltd company, but I would be interested to hear how the AJBL (and Phaidon if you take it) has gone down with your students and staff.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Tracey
>>
>> Tracey Lunt
>> Information Services Manager
>>
>> BDP
>> 1 North Bank
>> Sheffield S3 8JY, United Kingdom
>>
>> T +44 [0]114 270 9094
>> F +44 [0]114 228 9925
>> M +44 [0]7920 268 399
>> E [log in to unmask]
>> www.bdp.com
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Architecture Librarians group
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Carla Marchesan
>> Sent: 26 September 2014 14:03
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: FW: Message to list re: AJ
>>
>> Dear all,
>> I hope this e-mail finds you all very well.
>> I am forwarding this on behalf of David Stacey in Bath, as he had problems posting to the list.
>>
>> David, when AJBL came out in 2012, we invited them to come and give a presentation at our Annual Conference when we negotiated a group deal of £1000 + VAT to raise to keep in line with the cost of living, a few people signed up then, via IP recognition. Might be worth mentioning.
>> A few institutions subscribed then or shortly after. It will be interesting to know how many still subscribe and if they pay the negotiated price or not.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Carla
>>
>> Carla Marchesan
>> Librarian, Tutor & ARCLIB Chair
>> D +44 (0)20 7613 8507
>>
>> The Prince's Foundation & Prince's School of Traditional Arts
>> 19-22 Charlotte Road, London EC2A 3SG
>> T +44 (0)20 7613 8500
>> www.princes-foundation.org & http://www.psta.org.uk/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Stacey [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 26 September 2014 12:38
>> To: Carla Marchesan
>>
>> ..............................
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Has anyone else been contacted recently by AJ/AJBL with a revised price on their online access? Last year I think we all rejected a £6k+ subscription price (which didn't even include perpetual access)!
>>
>> They appear to have knocked this down and are offering pricing for multiples of 10 individual log ins (not very helpful) or unlimited IP access at a price according to your institution's FTE, which is probably nearer half the £6k for most of us (or less?).
>>
>> There is a bit of added pressure as they are looking to hike the price 10-12% from the start of October. Has anyone taken up either offer? Is anyone interested in negotiating as a group?
>>
>> Let me know what you think.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> David
>>
>> .................................
>>
>>
>> Did it go through ok?
>>
>> David
>>
>> --
>> David Stacey, MCLIP, FHEA
>> Faculty Librarian, Engineering & Design University of Bath Claverton
>> Down Bath BA2 7AY
>> Tel: 01225 385594
>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged.
>> It may be read, copied and used by the intended addressee only. If you have received this in error please contact BDP immediately.
>> If you have any queries, please contact the sender.
>> **********************************************************************
>> **********************************************************************
>> ***********************************************
>> United Kingdom - Building Design Partnership Limited, registered in England 2207415, registered office PO Box 85, 11 Ducie Street, Piccadilly Basin, Manchester M60 3JA.
>>
>> Republic of Ireland - Building Design Partnership (Architects, Designers, Engineers) Limited, registered in Ireland 197668, registered office Blackhall Place, Blackhall Green, Dublin 7.
>>
>> The Netherlands - BDP Khandekar B.V. registered in the Netherlands 28067722, registered office Secretaris Runsinkbrink 1, 2731 AG Benthuizen.
>>
>> India - BDP Design Engineering Private Limited, registered in India, Corporate Identity Number U74900DL2009FTC189644, registered office L20 Green Park (Main), New Delhi 110016.
>>
>> United Arab Emirates - BDP MENA Consulting Engineers LLC, registered in Abu Dhabi, Trade License Registration Number 1019794, registered office Suite 202, Al-Jahili Tower, Corniche Road, P O Box 41670, Abu Dhabi.
>>
>> China - BDP Architectural Design Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Limited,
>> registered in China 310000400639211, registered office Unit A, Floor 17, No 45, Nanchang Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200020
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and/or its attachments you must not take any action based upon them and you must not copy or show them to anyone. Please send the email back to us and immediately and permanently delete it and its attachments.
>
> Where this email is unrelated to the business of University of the Arts London or of any of its group companies the opinions expressed in it are the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of University of the Arts London (or the relevant group company).
>
> Where the sender’s signature indicates that the email is sent on behalf of London Artscom Limited the following also applies: London Artscom Limited is a company registered in England and Wales under company number 02361261. Registered Office: University of the Arts London, 272 High Holborn, London WC1V 7EY.
|