"The objective is to make everyone think that the ECJ Judgment is rubbish when this is not the case."
I do think this is debatable.
Granted, the Court was asked to consider very specific questions, but therein lies the problem: the questions in question (!) singularly fail to lay data processing responsibility where it lies - name the data controllers that make personal data public in the first instance (namely the Spanish government, for not specifying a lifespan of the online publicity it contracted La Vanguardia to provide).
I expect we'll never know the reasoning behind the AEPD's apparent lack of questioning of its governments lack of a lifespan in its online notice contract, the lack of logical regulatory vision in the resultant questions to the Court or the Court's failure to send the AEPD back to the drawing board with the questions it was asking.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|