I think this is a merge bug (code missed out that initialised a structure
for output arrays). I've put that back so I'm afraid you need to update
the submodules again, so pull the main repository and ./update-modules
from the top, followed by a "make clean && make && make install" in the
applications/extractor directory....
Cheers,
Peter.
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Tim Lister wrote:
>
>> On 09/11/2014 02:50 AM, Peter W. Draper wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Tim Lister wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Peter W. Draper
>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Tim Lister wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Peter W. Draper
>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can you and Tim L make sure that the submodules are
>>>> up to date. This
>>>> is done using:
>>>>
>>>> ./update-modules
>>>>
>>>> (you may need the -f flag to force this).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have done this and rebuilt the code but I'm still
>>>> receiving a segfault. I tried it on a different
>>>> image just to check that and got the same thing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is the version that the sex command reports still incorrect?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it's still saying 2.5.0. I've done a 'chmod 000 <offending
>>>> binary>' on all other copies of said program (trying to avoid
>>>> triggering spam filters...) and made sure there are no other older
>>>> starlink distributions in my PATH - which ought to be enough ?
>>>
>>> Sounds like it. What does:
>>>
>>> cd applications/extractor
>>> ./sex
>>>
>>> report. If that's wrong how about:
>>>
>>> applications/extractor/sextractor/src
>>> ./sex
>>>
>>> these are supposed to be the same programs.
>>
>> I did the gut pull/update modules and rebuilt and I get:
>>
>> SExtractor (Starlink version) version 2.19.5 (2014-09-11)
>>
>> Written by Emmanuel BERTIN <[log in to unmask]>
>> Copyright 2012 IAP/CNRS/UPMC
>>
>> visit http://astromatic.net/software/sextractor
>>
>> SExtractor (Starlink version) comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
>> You may redistribute copies of SExtractor (Starlink version)
>> under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
>>
>> SYNTAX: sex <image> [<image2>][-c <configuration_file>][-<keyword> <value>]
>> to dump a default configuration file: sex -d
>> to dump a default extended configuration file: sex -dd
>> to dump a full list of measurement parameters: sex -dp
>>
>> from both now. (In fact a 'diff' between the two binaries produces no
>> difference).
>
> Phew at least the build issues seem to been fixed, good.
>
>> I am unfortunately still seeing the segfaults. I tried a new config file
>> produced by running '$EXTRACTOR_DIR/sex -dd' to see if that made a
>> difference but unfortunately not...
>
> So now we probably have a bug. Can I access the image you are using?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter.
>
>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Peter.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> TimL
>>
>> --
>> Dr Tim Lister
>> Astronomer and Project Scientist
>> Las Cumbres Observatory (LCOGT.net)
>> +1 805 880 1989
>>
>
> --
> Peter W. Draper, http://astro.dur.ac.uk/~pdraper
>
--
Peter W. Draper, http://astro.dur.ac.uk/~pdraper
|