JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  September 2014

PHD-DESIGN September 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Design as taught in different kinds of institutions

From:

Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:25:57 +0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (116 lines)

Dear Ken, Don, Cameron and all,

There is  some significant misunderstanding of  the '3 year- long thesis PhD' of the Oxford Cambridge type as found in the UK, many ex-colonies such as Australia and to some extent in countries such as Norway.

For decades, the 3 year long thesis PhD typically took around 7-10 years to complete. During that time, candidates were embedded to greater or lesser extent in a post-graduate research milieu supervised formally and informally by a variety of academics of greater and lesser knowledge and research and supervisory skills.

Most candidates muddled through via osmosis, drinking heavily and discussing deep and meaningful things over the red wine with other academics at late into the night parties. A significant element of the process was a socio-cultural indoctrination and acculturation into being an academic   In this context, the 3 year specification was a minimum time for submission of the PhD. This minimum period also to some extent guaranteed that the research project would be of a significant size and not subject to vagaries of academic fashion of less than 3 years.

The mess of most PhDs and the lack of prescriptive support  resulted in candidates having to explore multiple research methods and pathways often through misunderstanding and failure. Thus candidates indirectly gained a much broader research methods education than otherwise.

The process was inefficient but effective.  Effectiveness was important and inefficiency irrelevant when universities were primarily offering education to countries' elites. 

For the first three decades of the transition into mass tertiary education paid from the public purse, the inefficient long thesis PhD model remained substantially unchanged except for pressures to improve the educational skills of supervisors.

From the 1990s, however, emerged increasing pressure to make PhD education and university research worthwhile compared to other national initiatives funded out of the public purse.

As pressure increased for PhD research to become more relevant  and useful  it also became clear that it needed to also be timely.  Increased pace of innovation meant that many PhDs were completed after  the problems they had addressed were no longer relevant.

Increasingly, governments funding PhDs pressurised universities to ensure completion happened as early as possible. Metrics were introduced to measure universities success in shortening PhD timelines and funding was attached to success.

The effect of all the above is as predicted by Deming (Out of the Crisis etc.) and any number of systems practitioners such as Dr Trudi Cooper, with research into quality management in higher education. For any organisation that specifies metrics for outcomes, then  outputs become shaped by metrics regardless of them resulting in reduced quality or even total failure of the system.

The shift to regarding the PhD 3 year measure as a maximum rather than a minimum, reductions in supervision funding and access, increased take up of PhDs in areas such as Art and Design that have little prior PhD education history,  increased prioritisation of PhD projects that will be guaranteed to be completed and completed on time and are immediately relevant in knowledge and a variety of other metric related factors  has resulted in the observed problems of lack of research skills and expertise of candidates on completion.

The PhD situation follows  the old three option rule:

'The only options are good, cheap and fast, and you can only have 2 out of the 3'

At the moment, the pressure is on for cheap and fast. Forget good. Good requires more money and time (for candidates and supervisors)

This is not a matter of 3 year PhD or otherwise, of different cultures and education systems, or even ofdifferent disciplines. The driving forces for reduced quality are from changes in the trajectory of support and the use of metrics.

Bryn Tellefsen and myself reported on some of this discussion  in 2002 (published 2004) in relation to design doctorates (http://www.love.com.au/docs/2004/future_of_design_doctorate.htm )

Best wishes,
Terry

---
Dr Terence Love
PhD(UWA), BA(Hons) Engin. PGCEd, FDRS, AMIMechE, MISI
Director,
Love Services Pty Ltd
PO Box 226, Quinns Rocks
Western Australia 6030
Tel: +61 (0)4 3497 5848
Fax:+61 (0)8 9305 7629
[log in to unmask] 
--




-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Friedman
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2014 2:17 AM
To: PhD-Design
Subject: Re: Design as taught in different kinds of institutions

Dear Cameron,

One of the problems that has become apparent to me with the three-year PhD is the fact that it may not be a genuine research degree. Since I have made the full argument in the paper on writing and supervising the PhD (Friedman 2014), I won’t make it here.

The short argument is that the full model of the PhD program teaches research skills, research methods, and compare ative research methodology, along with giving students a foundation in appropriate areas that will be vital to a full research career. In contrast, many of the 3-year PhD programs teach only those research skills needed for the specific research project that a student hopes to complete within the program.

What we are seeing is a significant number of graduates who cannot conduct research outside a very narrow project, who cannot and do not publish their research, and who lack the skills required for doctoral supervision outside their own field.

If you’d care to read the full argument, you’ll find it in the “PhD Training, Skills and Supervision Section” of my Academia page. It is the paper titled Writing for the PhD in Art and Design.

https://swinburne.academia.edu/KenFriedman
  
There is another explanation for the complaint that North American universities turn out too many PhD graduates. The PhD degree is the degree for most research jobs, in universities and outside them. There are more people seeking such jobs than the available number of academic and research positions. A careful review will show a mismatch between graduated doctors and appropriate jobs in many nations. 

When I served as a dean, our university policy was that the deans would sit on every hiring committee for each research position within his or her faculty. This meant that I reviewed the CV of every applicant and read theses, conference papers, and articles for everyone we shortlisted. I found that many people who held a PhD in art and design fields were simply not competent as researchers; many could not demonstrate basic research skills. In this respect, I am not distinguishing between those researchers that were first rate and those who were merely competent. I saw that many people did not have the basic skills that authors such as Gordon Rugg and Marian Petre (2004: 6-7) identify as essential for completing a doctoral degree. This suggests to me that many 3-year doctoral programs are not simply “easier” than solid North American programs. Rather, it suggests that they fail to meet basic standards. 

In this respect, I am specifically writing about PhD graduates in art and design. This is not the case in other fields where laboratory traditions and seminar traditions are in place, along with cohorts of experienced supervisors.

Yours, 

Ken

Ken Friedman, PhD, DSc (hc), FDRS | Editor-in-Chief | 设计 She Ji. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation | Published by Elsevier in Cooperation with Tongji University Press | Launching in 2015 

Chair Professor of Design Innovation Studies | College of Design and Innovation | Tongji University | Shanghai, China ||| University Distinguished Professor | Centre for Design Innovation | Swinburne University of Technology

—

Reference

Friedman, Ken. 2014. Writing for the PhD in Art and Design. Issues for Research Supervisors and Research Students. A Research Skills Working Paper. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology.

Rugg, Gordon, and Marian Petre. 2004. The Unwritten Rules of PhD Research. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.

--

Cameron Tonkinwise wrote:

—snip—

Not sure 'easier' is a useful characterization. 

3 year minimum PhDs are not unique to Oxbridge but standard across the Commonwealth, EU and Scandinavia and increasingly South, Southeast and East Asia and South America. American exceptionalism results from the degree serving different purposes: academic job training vs research degree (crudely put). This why in the US 'too many PhDs for the number of academic jobs'  is a frequent discussion, and examples of people with PhDs taking up non-academic positions remain newsworthy.

—snip—


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager