JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  August 2014

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING August 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Video Games into the Museum

From:

Sue Gollifer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sue Gollifer <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 25 Aug 2014 12:22:06 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (256 lines)

You may like to check this out

CURATOR’S STATEMENT

The ACM SIGGRAPH DIGITAL ARTS COMMUNITY (DAC) sponsored online game art show showcases recent indie digital games from independent developers that are uniquely creative in putting together striking and distinctive aesthetics with engaging gameplay.

http://gameartshow.siggraph.org/gas/
________________________________________
From: Curating digital art - www.crumbweb.org [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Simon Meek [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 25 August 2014 12:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] Video Games into the Museum

Hi all,

there's a load of comprehensive, thought-provoking discussion going on here
- and I'm keen not to add too much more to the mix (as it seems we need to
start boiling it all down). However, in terms of the exhibition, I think
there is something to be had in the notion of "Evolution" of videogames. By
this, I'm not referring exclusively to technology, or gameplay, visual
aesthetics or social commentary, but certainly they all have an interesting
story within the context of the interactive entertainment market and its
cultural development. As this notion is branching and multi-threaded -
taking us into genre classification, audience, milestones and oddities etc
- I think there's a really interesting structure to be had here. It also
'humanises' games development by implying the notion of evolution, and to
frame the exhibition in this way would be a very bold move (as more than
any other media, the evolution of videogames is by *far* the most
interesting and on the whole very naturalistic and personality driven).

Also, I do recall seeing an amazing evolutionary chart around the human
race and - as a younger man at the time - it completely blew my mind.
Something like this one:
http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/wp-content/blogs.dir/435/files/2012/04/i-6263a0227cef5282802b34e9074d4045-humanevotree.gif

Best,

Simon

PS. I'm also of the mind that we should avoid the arcade gallery approach.
I'm not even sure of the merit of letting people 'play' these games. I'd
vote for something less nostalgic and more progressive - in particular as
we have seen interactive entertainment become the most dominant media, yet
one that is still to achieve its full potential in many respects.


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Huber, William <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hello, everyone. I work with Gregor as a Lecturer at Abertay University;
> my research is in the field of game studies,  from an art/media historical
> perspective.  What follows are some disparate thoughts about the exhibition
> of games, and how a museological approach might illuminate our
> understanding of the way that games are made, and the unexpected effects
> they might have on us as contemporary subjects.
>
> I agree that conventional chronological approaches, as well as
> genre-historical ones, may not be the only best use of exhibition space,
> and that simply creating a space to play games ("arcade in the museum")
> fails to contribute to any real understand of them: it risks being a crude
> mechanism for naive claims of cultural significance.
>
> Responding to the call for thinking about the relationship between
> producers (from solo makers to globally distributed networks of
> production), the objects (platforms, software, representations, systems)
> and publics (players and other stakeholders), scale, rather than chronology
> or genre, may offer another organizing principle, and within expansions of
> scale, we might think about the effects which games sustain, and take them
> as the dominant native aesthetics of games.
>
> There are three broad categories of game-based aesthetics (in the broadest
> sense of the term, as descriptions of the qualia of human experience)
> which I think could be considered: relational, procedural, and "twitch"
> (kinaesthetic/cognitive.) Of course, games participate in traditional
> visual, auditory and conceptual aesthetics, as well, but these three strike
> me as the most "native" to game design, and also represent the strongest
> contributions that games make to our understanding of the space of the
> aesthetic.
>
> I think, following Gregor, that disaggregation of the elements of design
> and game experience would help foreground their contributions to
> contemporary culture (e.g., could we imagine Twitter and Instagram becoming
> important elements of network-driven culture if a set of literacies and
> competencies in interface-manipulation hadn't been forged by generations of
> game-players? Have games participated in a reorganization of human
> attention that has significance for other fields of cultural activity?)
>
> ¬ Wm.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curating digital art - www.crumbweb.org [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of White, Gregor
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:20 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] Video Games into the Museum
>
> Johannes raises a number of interesting questions of what an exhibition of
> games might be like. It might be useful to return to some of the issues
> raised during the first workshop of the project where games designers were
> asked what should be in exhibited and how it should de exhibited.
>
> The two areas where there was a broad consensus were what the exhibition
> should not be, a chronology, or an arcade. The rational being that
> chronologies are readily accessible, and besides the logistical problems
> (visitors spending long periods at each exhibition) of exhibiting games
> there was a concern that playing the games in the exhibition environment
> would undermine the ‘intimacy’ between the game and the played that is
> achieved in the home.
>
> I found this particularly interesting. The same effect (dislocation from
> the intimacy of use) is true of the clothing, furniture and countless
> objects held in museum collections. In these collections the intimate
> relationship is used as much to tell us about the people who used the
> object as the object itself.  Perhaps drawing a distinction between this
> museological approach and a gallery exhibition will help to locate what
> kind of artefacts might be collected and how they are exhibited.
>
> Does the exhibition of games where the purpose is to expose the
> relationship between the designer, the artefact and the players through the
> presentation of contextual materials help to locate the kind material that
> should be exhibited?
>
> Gregor
> ________________________________________
> From: Curating digital art - www.crumbweb.org [
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Johannes Birringer [
> [log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 18 August 2014 19:16
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] Video Games into the Museum
>
> dear Chris, and all:
>
> [Gary Penn schreibt]
> >>
> It depends on what each object needs to say in terms of games and design.
> Showing objects and their functions (even in contexts) is one thing; it's
> quite another to appreciate how and why that object ended up with its final
> function and form (and how both final function and form affect the object's
> presence).>>
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification, Chris, though I detect a small contradiction
> in your conclusion: if as you believe (and I don't) we are all gamers, then
> the museum must know its audience and wants to appeal to all," the
> culturally curious of all ages, genders, ethnicities etc."
>
> But what [well, how?] does the museum curate/exhibit, is it the wide
> variety and possibilities of digital games? A selection of that wide
> variety? in an arcade?
> on/with  consoles, laptops, computers, screens, controllers?  Images? Time
> lines, histories?  Antiques like the Jumpman Mario, and late releases, like
> Grand Theft Auto V, along with critiques and panel discussions on mazes,
> avatar rape?
> Machinima workshops, children's tours, listening rooms for game sound
> tracks?
>
> will it enable the curious to discover more about all kinds of digital
> games and their production?    will it mention independent festivals (I
> remember working with the "ScreenPlay" group in Nottingham in 2004-05, with
> shows at Broadway Cinema and hacker workshops, etc).
>
> will it extract "objects" [images of objects?] from games, functions,
> narratives and whatever affordances (those would be experienced actually
> playing the games, using the interfaces, going up the levels, rehearsing,
> comparing?) and how will it exhibit the extractions and accessories?
>
> how different would such a show be from an art exhibition (say, the huge
> El Greco show currently at the Prado in Madrid) or a sound art exhibition
> such as the one I mentioned, at the Science Museum ["The Exponential Horn:
> In Search of Perfect Sound",  side by side with Electronica, Radiophonics
> and Oramics, which seemed to attract the culturally, scientifically  and
> pop and radio culturally curious], or not? and could games indeed be
> perceived "as a medium and taken increasingly seriously as culture and art"?
>
> Well, I am not sure where to go with this, as I am still quite uncertain
> about a critical or expository exhibit of the design processes,
> creativites, and interface engineering  (and Marc Garrett just announced an
> interesting event in Munich called "Beyond the Interface", which also seems
> to reference Lori Emerson's new book, Reading Writing Interfaces), and how
> this could be done. I went to the Gaultier show at the Barbican to learn
> more about the design processes and saw hundreds of fashion objects and
> "talking" mannequins (video projections on mannequin faces), photographs,
> and (combined) garments from different eras of the designer's career, but
> my curiosity in Gaultier's design choices, fashion and sexual politics was
> largely blocked as I did not understand (or was not given information)
> enough of the contexts, design and materials constructions, effects or
> impacts, the wearing, etc, so had to be resigned to enjoy the sensual
> beauty and the punk/funk surface craziness of the displays.
>
> Are you imaging that the culturally curious will be prepared to read and
> admire the function and form and the affect of the game object's presences?
>
>
> regards
> Johannes Birringer
>
>
> [Chris Lowthorpe schreibt]
> >>
> Things are changing. Digital games are growing up as a medium and being
> taken increasingly seriously as culture and art, as the increasing number
> of exhibitions proves. But still negative perceptions persist ­ the British
> Prime Minister proudly informed the media recently that his children were
> banned from playing games ­ and many still believe games are inherently
> violent or of little cultural worth. For me the exhibition shouldnąt be
> pandering to or reinforcing these opinions but challenging them. It should
> showcase the variety and possibilities of digital games, exposing the
> creativity and design processes behind such powerful experiences.
>
> The reason this doesnąt appear to be happening, as I see it, is because
> the exhibition doesnąt currently seem to know who its audience is. This
> might be a result of strategic policy within the V&A ­ a desire to engage a
> younger audience ­ that has pushed the tone towards appealing to Śgamersą
> who they believe mostly lie within this target demographic, or for a
> variety of reasons Iąm not privy to. Whatever, I think targeting an
> exhibition at a diminishing niche audience of Śgamersą is not the way to
> go. In a society where most of us now play digital games of some kind, an
> exhibition should appeal to the culturally curious of all ages, genders,
> ethnicities etc. and enable them to discover more about all kinds of
> digital games and their production.
>
> After all, weąre all gamers now.
>
> >>
>
> Abertay University
> Scotland's leading modern university for psychology research (RAE 2008)
> The University of Abertay Dundee is a charity registered in Scotland, no.
> SC016040
>
> Abertay University
> Scotland's leading modern university for psychology research (RAE 2008)
> The University of Abertay Dundee is a charity registered in Scotland, no.
> SC016040
>



--
Simon Meek / creative director
The Secret Experiment +44 (0)141 628 7960
thesecretexperiment.co.uk / @thesecretexp

___________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs' Email Security
System on behalf of the University of Brighton.
For more information see http://www.brighton.ac.uk/is/spam/
___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs' Email Security
System on behalf of the University of Brighton.
For more information see http://www.brighton.ac.uk/is/spam/
___________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager