JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  June 2014

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING June 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Antw: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] Antw: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] An article that doesn't understand new media art | An Archive that does

From:

Kelani <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kelani <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:42:42 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (228 lines)

Dom,
Thank you for the articulation above, your words are uplifting!

Growing so tired of the term 'digital' in this conversation, afterall it is just art (as many smart people have cast a light on, time to pickup this torch IMHO) to be sure, the distinction is useful to an end, but relying on it for decades now to indicate something the artworld (institution as well as market) is not well equipped to parse to begin with has indeed created these suburbs, ghettos, grottos, tech demos and the like we all operate within to some extent (unfortunately) as the distinction collapses entirely in culture at large, it increasingly functions more as a barrier to the accessibility of this artwork.

Looking forward to partying with Pau in two weeks, inside one of our strongest netart shows yet, welcoming him to lively conversation in the hopes he might find the words to begin to see and speak past the 'media' in this work we all care about deeply.

Bests,
Kelani



> On Jun 28, 2014, at 7:28 AM, Oliver Grau <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Domenico,
> 
> 
> thank you for your friendly words. You might have missed the
> part of the discussion, where colleagues posted for the 2nd or 3rd time
> an
> underqualified article also on digital media art, and started a
> lamento.. I do
> not know, where you take your interpretation "us vs. them" from,
> since my point was the opposit, it was on the strength of digital media
> art and my point was on (museum) infrastructure. 
> 
> 
> Although (digital) media art on more than 200 festivals and
> biennials is more successful than ever, it is not entering the museum
> system,
> due to a system failior. If you can show me the museums, which collected
> and
> preserved the main artworks by Eduardo Kac, 
> Myron Krueger, jeffrey Shaw, Maurice Banayoun, Char Davies and many,
> many others you can make a point and will all help us... Char Davies
> Osmose
> alone received more than 100 scientific articles but is shown in no
> museum on
> our planet. And a digital culture we live in most parts of the world,
> which
> excludes large parts of its contemporary culture is getting into a
> problematic
> situation for its democratic dicourse (via) art. 
> 
> 
> In order to fulfil its duty, to collect and preserve the
> most significant contemporary art the Museum System has to reorganise to
> become
> apropriate for the cultures of the digital age, in alliances with
> science
> centers, archives and the digital industries. If govenments start
> conferences
> with their museums asking, what are you doing precisely to follow the
> law and
> protect digital art? The answer would be very poor and could initiate an
> understanding that individual museums are not sufficiantly equiped to do
> that
> job. We might need alliances, where, say the museums in Bavaria are
> responsible
> and built up the needs for "interactive installations", in Lower
> Saxony for "Net Art", in Berlin for "Bio Art" etc.
> 
> 
> TATE Britain, as leading european Museum, now has again the
> chance to bring this initiative on a european level (TATE Modern had
> ironically
> a conf on the same topic 10 yeras ago..)
> Also the digital industry, who wants to sell us every year a
> new laptop, has to help, to protect the cultures created (not born) on
> their
> machines, perhaps with a tax: Apple, Microsoft, Google etc. also have to
> contribute and should not avoid tax by moving to low-tax countries.
> 
> 
> 
> As all media artworks of the past (Sculpture, Painting) etc.
> are bound to the condition of their media (Stone, Canvas, Foto, Film)
> also
> digital art has its needs, we cannot simply ignore that fact by
> propagating a
> "post medial condition" ... which leads in the case of digital art to
> its extinction.
> 
> 
> 
> I would like to draw your attention also on the LIVERPOOL
> DECLARATION, signetd meanwhile by more than 400 colleagues, which asks
> consequently for an "international" and "sustainable"
> support of media art research.
> http://www.mediaarthistory.org/declaration Please feel free to sign. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Many regards, Oliver
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>> Domenico Quaranta <[log in to unmask]> 28.06.14 11.28 Uhr >>>
> Dear Oliver,
> 
> I wasn’t able to follow the entire conversation, but I find your “us vs
> them”, attack-to-defende-your-territory approach, counterproductive at
> least. We shouldn’t have those little dogs who bark from beyond the
> garden’s gate (and yelp when you get too close) as our primary model.
> I'm far from sharing Pac Pobric's idea that internet art is "provincial
> conversation", but I'm afraid to see some traces of this provincialism
> in this discussion.
> A bad review is just a bad review in an ongoing cultural dialogue. The
> history of media art is full of them, as well as it is full of equally
> silly claims that media art is the only thing that counts in art today.
> This is how the press - some press - goes. 
> But this is only the sea foam over the surface. Deep down - and yeah,
> even in the evil, rotten art market and the mainstream art world - there
> are people working hard to generate a broader debate and understanding
> of art made with digital media, and that do notthe whole country of art is does indeed belong to them. Not recognizing
> this, you fall in the same mistake that Pobric did - only from a
> different perspective. 
> Also, I think that art made to feed the institution, and responding to
> its formats and rules, is no less boring and irrelevant than art made to
> feed the market. 
> Forgive me for being so straight, but in every word of your post is
> somehow implicit the idea that new media art - and its community of
> supporters - is a minority with a great pedigree that should be
> protected by law, supported by institutions and discussed only by the
> happy few. This is not true - and if it was, it would be very boring 
> 
> My best regards,
> Domenico
> 
> ---
> 
> Domenico Quaranta
> 
> email: [log in to unmask]
> skype: dom_40
> 
> http://domenicoquaranta.com
> http://www.linkartcenter.eu
> 
> 
> 
>> Il giorno 26/giu/2014, alle ore 05:35, Oliver Grau ha scritto:
>> 
>> Dear colleagues,
>> I couldn't agree more with Jon and others: We should not be frustrated
>> by ignorant articles of people writing for the Art Market, which has
>> other interests.
>> Over the last fifty
>> years, media art has evolved
>> into a vivid cultural expression. Although there are well attended
>> festivals
>> worldwide,
>> collaborative projects, discussion forums and databases (Da Costa and
>> Kavita 2010; Dixon 2007; Gardiner 2010; Grau 2003 and
>> 2011; Popper 2007; Shanken 2009;
>> Sommerer and Mignonneau 2007; Vesna 2007; Wilson 2010), media art is
>> still too rarely collected by museums,
>> barely supported within the mainframe of art history and with
> relatively
>> low accessibility for the public
>> and scholars. As we know, compared to traditional art forms – painting
>> or
>> sculpture – digital media art, has a multifarious potential of
>> expression and
>> visualization; and therefore, although underrepresented at the art
>> market that
>> follows other interests and commercial logics, it became a ‘legitimate
>> art of
>> our time’. Media addresses a variety of complex topics and challenges
>> for our
>> life and societies, like genetic engineering (Anker and Nelkin 2003;
>> Hauser
>> 2008; Kac 2009; Reichle 2005) and the rise of post human bodies
>> (Hershman-Leeson 2007), globalisation and ecological crises
> (Himmelsbach
>> 2007, Cubitt 2005, Demos 2009, Borries 2011),
>> the explosion of human knowledge, the image and media revolution (Grau
>> 2011;
>> Mitchell 2011), the change towards virtual financial economies, and
> new
>> extremes of surveillance of all human communication (Ozog 2008).
>> 
>> 
>> We therefore should not stop communicate, that digital art is able to
>> deal with the big issues of our time, all thematized on festivals and
>> meanwhile 200 biennials all over the world. We should not count on the
>> art market, but we should remind our tax financed museum system (in
>> Europe) that it is their job, by law, to document, collect and
> preserve
>> the relevant art of the time - as we know, the museum system, founded
> in
>> the 18th century, ideal to preserve the media of its time (sculpture,
>> painting etc.) is not in the situation to fulfill their job. But many
>> museums are fully aware that this is the case - like TATE - where I
>> could give a lecture on the topic a few weeks ago. The museum system
> has
>> to reorganize to catch up with the digital age. There are thousands of
>> digital art works, shown around the world, which received an endless
>> number of articles and lectures, who never made it into the
> collections
>> payed by us. Some you find in the archive of digital art:
>> www.digitalartarchive.at
>> Many regards,
>> Oliver
>> 
>> 
>> Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr.h.c. habil. Oliver Grau
>> Chair Professor for Image Science
>> DONAU UNIVERSITÄT
>> Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Strasse 30
>> 3500 Krems, AUSTRIA
>> Tel. +43 (0) 2732 893 2550
>> www.donau-uni.ac.at/bild
>> ****************************
>> Archive of Digital Art www.digitalartarchive.at
>> Graphische Sammlung Goettweig-Online www.gssg.at
>> New Publication: Oliver Grau (Ed.): Imagery in the 21st Century,
>> Cambr>> I am concerned too with "invisibility" of excellent work....Some
>> projects are not even browsable anymore even if done less than 10
> years
>> ago. And I feel that this is bringing out so many interesting
> positions
>> that would not necessarily come to light if these people were not
>> practitioners.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager