JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FRIENDSOFWISDOM Archives


FRIENDSOFWISDOM Archives

FRIENDSOFWISDOM Archives


FRIENDSOFWISDOM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FRIENDSOFWISDOM Home

FRIENDSOFWISDOM Home

FRIENDSOFWISDOM  June 2014

FRIENDSOFWISDOM June 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Campaign for Wisdom-Inquiry

From:

Ian Glendinning <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:37:39 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (194 lines)

Nick and all,

Accepting that the aim of this particular group is:
(B) To transform academia so that it puts wisdom-inquiry into practice.

With the wider objective of:
(A) To help make progress towards a wiser world (or, more modestly, to
help promote wisdom in the world).
.... towards a better world generally.

The question is "How" to transform what academia does, how to change
its values and decision-making, so that it does put "wisdom enquiry",
or the equivalent by any other name, when deciding on curricula and
course content. Simply repeating and communicating the (B) message
that it should, doesn't make it so, doesn't address the how.

Money is a key component of decision-making in academia, what pays and
what do money and debt mean, etc.
Money is the supremely objective marker in real-number-quantifiable
terms, the "currency" of choice, the epitome of rational objective
decision-making generally, and that scientistic neurosis is more
general as you have yourself pointed out Nick.

However right "Wisdom Enquiry" and Aim Oriented Rationality messages
are, they are described technically and hard to "sell". You said
yourself when presenting your latest book earlier this year at
UCL,that it's the same message you been proclaiming for 40(?) years.
In order to sell it / them we need to change hearts and minds about
how academic decisions are made and accepted as valid by those
affected.

Ian

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Alan Nordstrom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Nick, et al.,
>
>
> With respect to the alleged environmental problem of curtailing carbon
> emissions assumed to harm the health of our biosphere, what roles should
> universities—as seedbeds of wisdom—play in addressing this problem?
>
>
> Since "a basic task [of universities] ought to be to help humanity learn how
> to create a better world" [FOW], it seems clear that universities are indeed
> appropriate venues for investigating the parameters of this apparent threat
> and seeking apt means to mitigate it, scientifically, politically and
> practically.
>
>
> Thereby "Academic inquiry . . . would become a kind of people's civil
> service" [FOW]. This would be one way that academia could "put wisdom
> inquiry into practice" [FOW].
>
>
> Cheer, Alan
>
>
> Alan Nordstrom, PhD, LVP
> Professor of English
> Rollins College
> Winter Park, FL  32789
> (407) 629-1785
>
> BLOG: verses, essays and images
> http://alan-nordstrom.blogspot.com/
>
> "Don't let school interfere with your education."
> ________________________________
> From: Group concerned that academia should seek and promote wisdom
> <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Maxwell, Nicholas
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 8:38 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Campaign for Wisdom-Inquiry
>
>
> Dear Friend of Wisdom,
>
>
>
>                                      I would like to thank all those who
> have replied to my request for ideas as to how we might get a campaign for
> wisdom-inquiry underway – especially those with helpful suggestions as to
> how we might do it.
>
>
>
>                                      Before I attempt to summarize what has
> been said so far, there is one crucial distinction I need to make.  There
> are two quite distinct campaigns before us, namely:
>
>
>
> (A) To help make progress towards a wiser world (or, more modestly, to help
> promote wisdom in the world).
>
> (B) To transform academia so that it puts wisdom-inquiry into practice.
>
>
>
>                                    My concern is with (B).  Friends of
> Wisdom was founded over ten years ago with (B) in mind.   Or rather, with a
> somewhat more modest (though still immodest) goal in mind, namely to create
> awareness, within and without academia, of the urgent need to transform
> academia so that something like wisdom-inquiry is put into practice.
>
>
>
>                                    (A) is the campaign we all care about.
> All sorts of groups are struggling to put all sorts of aspects of (A) into
> practice all over the world: groups concerned with peace, justice, civil
> rights, the environment, the economy, global warming, slavery, poverty,
> hunger, preventable disease, democracy, individual liberty, the flourishing
> of wisdom, and so on.  (B) is primarily a means to the end of (A) – yet
> another potential contribution to (A).  What makes (B) so important,
> however, is that (1) it is vital that humanity possesses wisdom-inquiry if
> it is to learn how to make progress towards a better, wiser world, but (2)
> hardly anyone appreciates this point, and hardly anyone is actively engaged
> in the task of helping to transform our institutions of learning so that
> they do put something like wisdom-inquiry into practice.
>
>
>
>                                  We are, above all, the species that learns.
> We really can learn how to make progress towards a better, wiser world.  But
> in order to do that, it is essential that our public institutions of
> learning, our schools and universities, are rationally designed for, and
> devoted to the job.  For what we require, above all, is social learning,
> public learning, learning of our institutions, our corporations, social
> arrangements and governments.  Our problem is that academia as constituted
> by and large around the world, shaped by what I have called
> “knowledge-inquiry” is profoundly and damagingly irrational when judged from
> the standpoint of promoting human welfare (or helping us make progress
> towards a better world).  The argument is spelled out on our website at
> http://www.knowledgetowisdom.org/basic_arg.htm .  (For a more detailed
> summary of the argument see http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/16142/1/16142.pdf .
> For a list of things that need to change if knowledge-inquiry is to become
> wisdom-inquiry, see
> http://www.ucl.ac.uk/from-knowledge-to-wisdom/whatneedstochange
>
> ).
>
>
>
>                               I do not think we stand much hope of making
> real progress towards a better, wiser world if we continue to have in our
> possession institutions of learning damagingly defective when judged from
> this standpoint, as at present.  Indeed, in terms of one entirely legitimate
> notion of “cause”, the cause of our current global problems is our
> long-standing implementation of knowledge-inquiry, our failure to implement
> wisdom-inquiry.  (The astonishing success of modern science and
> technological research leads to modern industry and agriculture, modern
> hygiene and medicine, and so, along with much that is good, all our current
> global problems.)
>
>
>
>                              We need to do many things in pursuit of (A).
> One vital, much neglected thing we need to do is successfully achieve (B).
> It is (B) that should be our concern here.
>
>
>
>                              And I would like to suggest that we take the
> campaign (B) as characterized on our Friends of Wisdom website, as our
> starting point at least, since it is that which has brought us together.  If
> wisdom-inquiry, as it has been characterized, does not seem to be what we
> should be aiming for, in some respect or other, then arguments need to be
> put forward as to what is wrong with it, and why such and such would
> constitute an improvement.  But, until there is general agreement about some
> improvement, we should take our goal to be what our Friends of Wisdom
> website advocates (at http://www.knowledgetowisdom.org/index.htm ).
>
>
>
>                            In my next email I will try to summarize
> responses to my request for ideas as to how we might get a campaign
> underway, and try to see what the next steps might be.
>
>
>
>                        Best wishes,
>
>
>
>                             Nick Maxwell
>
> Website: www.ucl.ac.uk/from-knowledge-to-wisdom
> Publications online: http://philpapers.org/profile/17092
> http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/view/people/ANMAX22.date.html
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
May 2011
April 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager