On 21 May 2014, at 17:48, Sam Skipsey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 16:31, Andrew McNab <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 21 May 2014, at 17:17, Adam Huffman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> While many features of Github are great, the issue tracking is woeful,
>>> which is why in some ways I lament this stampede…
>>
>> Indeed. LHCbDIRAC decided to stay with JIRA for this reason, and I think it’s straightforward for people with CERN accounts to create project/service accounts and make a JIRA instance for them. So that would be an option for some projects.
>
> So, given that you're using JIRA, I am a bit puzzled as to why
> LHCbDIRAC jumped to GitHub rather than BitBucket? It seems like it
> would make more sense to use the product developed by (and integrated
> with) the issue tracking tool you prefer?
One big reason is that the main DIRAC project uses GitHub already.
Cheers
Andrew
|