Exactly, a mechanism but not a full system or even full toolkit to manage citations of datasets from (a) datasets (b) software (b) white literature (d) grey literature
Keith
Keith G Jeffery Consultants
Prof Keith G Jeffery
E: [log in to unmask]
T: +44 7768 446088
S: keithgjeffery
Past President ERCIM www.ercim.eu ([log in to unmask])
Past President euroCRIS www.eurocris.org
Past Vice President VLDB www.vldb.org
Fellow (CITP, CEng) BCS www.bcs.org
Co-chair RDA MIG https://rd-alliance.org/internal-groups/metadata-ig.html
Co-chair RDA MSDWG https://rd-alliance.org/working-groups/metadata-standards-directory-working-group.html
Co-chair RDA DICIG https://rd-alliance.org/internal-groups/data-context-ig.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this email are sent in confidence for the use of the
intended recipient only. If you are not one of the intended
recipients do not take action on it or show it to anyone else, but
return this email to the sender and delete your copy of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Willmes
Sent: 02 May 2014 14:38
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: best practice for publication and citation of genotype datasets
Yes, but as far as I know it tracks metrics for datasets resolved via their DOI System. This is a good first step, but not the solution to the wider "credit for citation" problem.
Am 02.05.2014 15:34, schrieb Frey J.G.:
> What about the DataCite system
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 2 May 2014, at 14:33, "Christian Willmes" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Am 02.05.2014 12:59, schrieb Alistair Miles:
>>
>>> So if I understand right, there is no mechanism for tracking dataset
>>> citations, even if the dataset has a DOI and the DOI is always used
>>> when the dataset is cited?
>>
>> There are mechanisms, but no (at least not known to me) known
>> implemenations. (Does Google Scholar track datasets? I would assume
>> so, but I do not know for sure.) Basically it would be the same
>> mechanism as for normal publication cation metrics, if you cite the
>> data appropriately in the reference setion. Which is some central
>> data base (closed system) run by some entity (e.g. ISI Web of
>> Knowledge or Google Scholar). "Open Science"
>> concernes open solutions to this problem.
>>
>> Important is to always cite the data. I.e. give the credit, as it is
>> (or should be) practice. If you do not cite the data you use, you
>> simply violate good scientific practice. Reviewers of Journals should
>> take care of this.
>>
>> The reference syntax should be like for any other publication type
>> something like this:
>> Author(s) (Year): Tile. Resource (URI). Institution and/or Publisher.
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Willmes (Public-Key ID: 0x2FA87ED4)
>> AG GIS & Fernerkundung | GIS & RS Group
>> Geographisches Institut | Institute of Geography
>> Universität zu Köln | University of Cologne
>> Tel.: +49 (0)221 470 6234
>> Fax.: +49 (0)221 470 2280
>> http://www.geographie.uni-koeln.de/willmes-christian.695.en.html
>> http://www.sfb806.de
>> http://crc806db.uni-koeln.de
>> http://cwillmes.de
--
Christian Willmes (Public-Key ID: 0x2FA87ED4)
AG GIS & Fernerkundung | GIS & RS Group
Geographisches Institut | Institute of Geography
Universität zu Köln | University of Cologne
Tel.: +49 (0)221 470 6234
Fax.: +49 (0)221 470 2280
http://www.geographie.uni-koeln.de/willmes-christian.695.en.html
http://www.sfb806.de
http://crc806db.uni-koeln.de
http://cwillmes.de
|