Hi Sarah & List
> I don't think you understand picnolepsy and it is quite an
> important point, in terms of the momentary blurring of the real
> and the symbolic. I want to raise this issue in terms of
> and code because I think it is important that mental health is
> in all your deliberations. Why? You might ask. Because as Virilio
> it is a mental matter - how we interact with screens and machines.
Oh I see. You're talking about the integration of personal space
into the network.
That's an interesting area for art/research. Sherry Turkle broached
that subject with her book, Life On Screen and is continuing with her
research on that subject.
That also gets into the area of networked performance art. I've done
a few of those in the past.
> Rehearsal of Memory (Harwood) - oh btw yr operating system won't
> it anymore, so I guess that makes it a performative work...
> London (Harwood) exhibited in Old Media at Bristol's Arnolfini
> was a synthesis
> between Blake's poem and a computer program. The point is that in
> 2010 as
> opposed to 1996 it was a print which made you think about the
> symbolic and
> the real in terms of programming and poetry, and POLIITICS
I haven't seen that exhibition. I have no idea what you are talking
> Meanwhile eating disorders and self harm abound on Tumblr
> 'I'll self harm if you will' etc...
> Artists and curators are failing young people especially in the
> technological sphere by not addressing the reality of screen
> use and abuse etc
I don't know about that. There is a French net artist who set up a
fake website where she created a teenage girl who was threatening to
kill herself on her 15th Birthday.
I think her persona was (Collette) this was pre-facebook but the
chat rooms and emaillists believed it was real. I think that was a
meme or perhaps an archetype she was presenting.
In anycase, I think the whole networked culture is constantly
evolving. surveillance and voyeurism are two sides of the same coin.
That's an interesting topic. Recently I did a residency
at Pixel Palace (Tyneside Cinema in Newcastle). Lucy Pawluk was
another AIR. She's performance artist that explores the effects of
It is worth a discussion and enlarging on the ideas to which you
allude. There is alot of bullying going on on the internet and there
have been some suicide by teenagers as a consequence of that bullying.
I think that the isolation and false communities exacerbate and
magnify the emotions on one level. You are after all only talking to
yourself when you type into a computer.
> performativity is yet another distraction when it could be an
> apprehension of what is meant by the symbolic and the real
> in terms of computing
> -----Original Message----- From: gh hovagimyan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:35 PM
> To: Sarah Thompson
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] March Discussion Begins: The
> Performativity of Code
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Sarah Thompson wrote:
>> My question is do we need a framing structure for psychological
>> So that we know what is and isn't us, what is symbolic and what
>> is real
>> because if we suffer momentarily from Virilio's picnolepsy then
>> it might
>> be disturbing mentally?
> Interesting reference. I had to look it up. It seems that Virilio
> thinks we blank out and don't see/feel/hear/sense
> what we are looking at. I kinda liken this to a monkey reaching for
> the photo of a banana rather than the real fruit.
>> What does it mean 'to humanize the data space'? Do you mean to make
>> symbolic code fool us into losing our sense of self-space etc? Or
>> to reveal
>> what the symbolic data space is really made of
> By Humanize I mean that we control the how and why and method to
> access the data.