JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  March 2014

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING March 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: is there always an author for code

From:

Curt Cloninger <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:29:33 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (212 lines)

Hi Roger, G.H., and all,

I just feel like we're back at the AI/AL white elephant in the room. It's a tautological (and ultimately a teleological) white elephant. To say "non-human" presumes an agreed upon understanding of "human," to say "artificial intelligence" presumes an agreed upon understanding of "intelligence," to say "artificial life" presumes an agreed upon understanding of "life," and to say "self aware" presumes an agreed upon understanding of "self" and "aware." But we don't know what human-ness, intelligence, life, self, or awareness are (or at least we don't all agree on what they are). If you begin from a materialist (some would [pejoratively] say reductivist) biological (and especially computer scientific) understanding of life, complex software systems will likely confirm many of your original suppositions. But if others don't agree with your materialist presumptions, then your own observations and interpretations of your own software systems' behaviors won't convince them of your original suppositions.

You will say then that others are wrong. And from the perspective of your original suppositions, they are.

So 1) one forms an understanding of actual historical biological systems based (at least non-incidentally) on cybernetic systems. Then 2) one emulates those understandings of biological systems via cybernetic systems. And unsurprisingly, 3) one discovers "life" in these cybernetic systems. That is the tautology. But perhaps all sorts of salient, non-incidental (albeit non-quantifiable) aspects of "life" (affect, embodiment, historical contingency, Whiteheadean actualization of the virtual, just to name a few) escape this closed-circuit altogether.

Yes, something quite actual and funky is happening in both historical biological systems and emergent software systems. And these sytems correlate in all sorts of fascinatingly speculative ways. But I'm still not sure what "life" is.

Respectfully,
Curt


On Mar 23, 2014, at 12:24 PM, roger malina wrote:

> GH
>
> re your comment:
> i append an abstract that yvan tina just had accepted at SLSA titled
> A-Live: Biological and Artificial Theaters
>
> which is the sources of some of my comments in
> response to your:
>
>
> Hi Roger & the List,
> There is always human agency in any of these arguments.
> Of course you could have a world without humans but we are talking
> about coding that is about performance, especially art performance.
>
> I am not talking about a world without humans but a hybrid world with
> interactive performance between
> humans and other coded systems. RFM
>
>
> All of the systems we have been discussing take a viewer to recognize
> the system. It's a simple law of quantum physics. The viewer changes
> or isolates or recognizes or solidifies or manifests what they are
> observing.
>
> I disagree with this-has nothing to do with quantum mechanics !! plus
> if you look at cybernetic systems theory, complex
> systems can be self aware/observing_RFM
>
> Furthermore, code is always written with an end result in mind. Even a
> random system where you can't predict a result has the anticipation of
> a random result. Indeed, There are infinite variations on randomness
> in the universe.
>
> This is not true of artificial life software- you can create
> potentialities rather than end results. RFM
>
> They only become interesting when we observe them.
> The observer is the audience for the result.
> /gh
>
> Ph D student Yvan Tina just had this abstract accepted at SLSA which
> goes a little further
>
>
> roger malina
>
>
> The 8th Meeting of the European Society of Literature, Science and the Arts
>
> Life, in Theory // SLSAeu Conference 2014, Turin
>
>
>
> Stream 2 : Narrating Life: contagion, immunity, and mutation
>
> Authors : Yvan TINA, doctoral student (Aix-Marseille University /
> University of Texas at Dallas), Prof. Roger MALINA (University of
> Texas at Dallas, CNRS), Prof. Yannick BUTEL (Aix-Marseille
> University).
>
> Title : A-Live: Biological and Artificial Theaters (working title)
>
> keywords : meta, theater, design, a-life, synthetic biology, living,
> skenabiotope, bioart
>
> Christopher Langton, in the original workshops of what would lead to
> the constitution of Artificial Life as academic and artistics fields,
> issued the idea of exploring "life as it could be" (1). According to
> him, artificial systems which exhibit signs of life and life like
> behaviours are worthy of investigation in their own right because such
> systems can expand our understanding of life. Drawing on this, we
> introduce the notion of 'Meta-Life'(2) which refers to a specific type
> of natural or artificial entities with behaviours characteristic of
> life -be they artificial, transgenic, synthetic, or inorganic-
> belonging to the Arts of A-Life and Biotechnologies as well as the
> fruits of evolution. As Maciej Ozog has shown in his article on the
> relationships between the arts and the sciences, these practices are
> somehow 'meta-artistic' for the reason that they generate
> meta-discourses' (critical commentaries) on life, arts and sciences
> (3). Since theater, as a performing art, has something to do with the
> living and is meta-critical per se, we intend here to question the
> performative dimension of those practices/objects and to feed life
> sciences theories with few theatrical contributions. The notion of
> theatricality, which is for instance defined as a "density of signs
> and sensations" by Roland Barthes (4), or as a "medium" by Samuel
> Weber (5), could be applied to such kind of productions which affect
> the shaping of life itself and reveal theatricality potentials.
> Following Sally Jane Norman on her writings about the skenabiotope
> (6), we advance the idea that theater can also be seen as a suitable
> place for the modeling of life as art through the use of new media and
> technosciences.
>
>
>
>
>
> (1) Christopher Langton, Artificial Life, The Proceedings of an
> Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living
> Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1988
>
> (2) See Meta-Life. Biotechnologies, Synthetic Biology, A-Life and the
> Arts, a Leonardo eBook Series, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014.
>
> (3) Maciej Ozog, 'Art investigating Science : Critical Art as a
> Meta-Discourse of Science'. In Proceedings of Digital Arts and Culture
> Conference, Arts Computation Engineering, UC Irvine, 2009.
>
> (4) Roland Barthes, 'Litterature et signification', Essais critiques,
> in Oeuvres completes, Editions du Seuil, tome 2, p.508, 1993.
>
> (5) Samuel Weber, Theatricality as Medium, Fordham University Press, 2004.
>
> (6) Louis Bec coined this term from the greek skena, stage, and the
> biotope; it is defined as a 'dispositif' specially "constructed to
> study and amplify certain types of theatricalising or theatricalised
> behaviours in artificial organisms". Louis Bec, 'Skénabiotope. Etude
> des comportements modélisés et pamphlétaires d'organismes
> artificiels'. In: Arnaud Labelle-Rojoux (ed.), L'Art en scènes. pp.
> 115-126. Bois-le-Roi, 1992.
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, G.H. Hovagimyan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi Roger & the List,
>> There is always human agency in any of these arguments.
>> Of course you could have a world without humans but we are talking about coding that is about performance, especially art performance.
>> All of the systems we have been discussing take a viewer to recognize the system. It's a simple law of quantum physics. The viewer changes or isolates or recognizes or solidifies or manifests what they are observing.
>> Furthermore, code is always written with an end result in mind. Even a random system where you can't predict a result has the anticipation of a random result. Indeed, There are infinite variations on randomness in the universe.
>> They only become interesting when we observe them.
>> The observer is the audience for the result.
>> /gh
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:11 PM, roger malina <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> hi GH
>>>
>>> a few days back you made a statement
>>>
>>> "There is always an author for the code"
>>>
>>> Which I dont think is true and maybe introduces
>>> other issues on performativity
>>>
>>> one reference of course is dawkins blind
>>> watchmaker argument- and is particularly relevant
>>> to the work of algoricists such as john latham
>>> where the code is self generating and the artist intervenes
>>> in selection rather than design
>>>
>>> and with much large code-there are innumerable authors
>>> not an author
>>>
>>> and then you go on:
>>> there is a result from running the code.
>>>
>>> but like recessive genes, some code may only perform
>>> when there is a confluence of factors that enable its
>>> performance
>>>
>>>
>>> roger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>> I think you need to look at the whole coding process. There is
>>> always an author for the code and there is a result from running the
>>> code.
>>>
>>> gh hovagimyan <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> G.H. Hovagimyan
>> http://nujus.net/~gh
>> http://nujus.net/~nublog
>> http://artistsmeeting.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Roger F Malina
> Is in Texas right now
> please contact me by email but
> for very very urgent things phone/text me me
> 1-510-853-2007
> blog: malina.diatrope.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager