JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  March 2014

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING March 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Can non-human entities perform? / live coding research

From:

Johannes Birringer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Johannes Birringer <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 20 Mar 2014 22:35:13 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (73 lines)

dear all
yes, like Paul, I love the conversation too, and after reading his commentary on 
"requirements for virtuosity; legibility of virtuosity"  and the other ways,
the poorly done ways, I had to laugh. Just this morning I came a across
a piece of writing on lecture-performances where a curator is mentioned, 
Guillaume  Désanges, who apparently likes the notion of ‘deskilling’ as a central notion of 
conceptual art, developing from it the model of ‘deskilled curating’. *


Well, let me just reply briefly to Victoria -- thanks, yes, I like what you are doing in your comparison of "Hacking Choreography"
and "Hacking Choreography" -  and both pieces might be considered conceoptual art. 

>
Similarities: Instructions dictate action.

I wonder if Kate has tried engaging an audience with code-based instruction
rather than a dancer?

I am intrigued by Johannes's question: what would be syntax errors in
social code?
> 


In fact I don't see any similarities on the level of instruction-action, if you go back to issue of 
the space of politics/context that affects the performance of anything, never mind "code"
[I admit the word code is interesting, though, as some Italian friends recently used it
to refer quite metaphorically to what they thought could be understood by a public,
i.e. the message, not an underlying software code, but the surface;  code as surface)(Or message on how to use the thing)

so now we could speak about code as costume, cloth.
 
It has always struck my attention that I never cared much about fashion until I started to work with a designer who cared;
learning about it goes a long way, for me, towards interpreting all kinds of layers/accoutrements, metaphorical, mythic,  symbolic, cultural and perceptional -  regarding
how a "viewer" or interactor looks at and responds to surfaces, and toys, or bigger stuff piled up, thinner stuff, transparent or more eccentric garments and hats) and begins to sort out some questions
(like the ones we discussed on audiences, 'non-human entities',  physical/psychological terms (movement and movement empathy, kinaesthetics, emotional affect, etc) why who? to do with the thing.

       [Curt Cloninger's extravagant Taxonomical Continuum of "Artist/Audience" Relationships: "To look at art through the filter of control is to implicitly ask "who?" ]

"Cut Piece" had a complex social setting, in my opinion, as it invited (literally) violence done to Ono's clothes and, by implication, her vulnerable female body; thus the work
solicits complicity and at the same time (as some watched, others acted) a conflict space, as you may not agree with what you watch, and the social syntax has already broken down or is breaking down to be reupheld?,
violated, put to the test (as Victoria also explores in her examples), distressed, dis-dressed. 

 This is a dimension which I don't see in Kate's "Hacking Choreography" (thus the space of politics, even if you were to follow
on some implications of the microphone, the role of instructor, etc) is not actionable (by the audience).

I have not experienced "Cut Piece" live - but remember seeing a video of it with my design collaborator in the context of, surprisingly (!), fashion,  ---  a Royal Academy of Arts exhibition "AWARE: Art, Fashion, Identity" (2011).
I gather Cut Piece" had one verb as its instruction: "Cut."    Ono executed the performance herself in Tokyo in 1964 by walking on stage and casually kneeling on the floor in a draped garment. Audience members were requested to come on stage and begin cutting until she was naked.  Apparently folks were shy and careful in Tokyo, but at Carnegie Hall the next year, less shy, and sometimes these performances would get out of hand; this particular performance, documented, stops after 11 minutes, not finished, message scrambled?

regards

Johannes Birringer
dap-lab
"for the time being" [Victory over the Sun] 
Premiere April 3-4, Sadler's Wells
book here: http://www.brunel.ac.uk/dap 

>>>>>

[Paul schreibt]

I'm fascinated w/Live Code as a practice, and how there are requirements
for virtuosity; legibility of virtuosity; potential for failure; reception
of structure; interlacing of venue value systems; material rupture. Poorly
done live code, like other performances poorly done is quite exasperating;
though very bad theatre is a very specific real-time
cringe. Well done, viewers/audience can feel aloft; they may even be
aloft. Toplap is a fantastic resource - though I'd be curious to hear
about 

>>

* Rike Frank, "When Form starts talking: On Lecture Performances," Afterall 33 (summer 2013), 5-18.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager