It's fine - it would alert anyone to the existence of the issue, and
give them a clue how to solve it.
Cheers
Steve
On 2014-02-06 10:47, Matt Raso-Barnett wrote:
> On 06/02/14 10:06, sjones wrote:
>> Good work. Now I'm wondering how to document this to stop others from
>> falling in the same hole. Could you put a short explanation in
>> https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Argus_Server under the section on
>> "Configuring WN to use Argus for glexec authorization"?
>>
>> If others use LUSTRE, at least they might pick it up.
>
> Hi Steve, I've added a short paragraph to the bottom of that section:
> https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Argus_Server#Configuring_WN_to_use_Argus_for_glexec_authorization
>
> I've hopefully got the terminology right - let me know if it's not.
> It's a bit of a corner case as we use lustre for the home directories
> of the pool accounts rather than on the nodes local disk, which is
> part of why we saw the problem here as that is where the proxies seem
> to be stored and where the locking by glexec is done.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
|