JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  February 2014

MCG February 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Linking events, shop sales, bookings and CRM

From:

Sarah Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:16:31 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (57 lines)

Hi Mike

I have been through some of these arguments recently and would make the following points

1) expensive to procure, maintain and change
Can be true - but also true that organisational inefficiency probably costs far more for many organisations than working with a good software as a service company where development is ongoing and maintenance is taken care of . ( I know I am straying into another debate here, but SAS does offer a solution to complexity if they take on the problem )

2)putting organisations at risk of having a single, potentially quite risky, point of failure
When procuring software the risks are always assessed - several connecting systems have risks of their own, so it's not a given that the single solution is a bigger risk. It depends on what development has been done on integration -   generally speaking you want software where most of the learning has been done on other people's systems. 

3) “ok” at all of those bits, but not excellent at any single one of them
The general argument doesn't always hold. Development usually takes place because there is a strong need in the market. Some clients I deal with (not all) have a very strong need for integration, and that's particularly true for clients who are not enormous institutions with entrenched systems. So I am not surprised to find that things are on the move, and integration is on the agenda for some software suppliers. There is no perfect solution in any case, and I think the key is being able to work with software suppliers to move things forward, while minimising the risks and sometimes going for 'done not perfect'. And I'm a perfectionist!

Sarah 

On 11 Feb 2014, at 17:51, Mike Ellis wrote:

> Hi Cristiano  
> 
> First off, I should make it clear that, no, I haven’t tried your system and therefore have no direct experience of it - so should apologise if I appeared negative about something I haven’t tried. That wasn’t my intention - I was making a general point.  
> 
> [ And yes, I’d like to try it - and would be delighted to be proved wrong ]
> 
> But: in my experience - and ** I’m not talking now about Qi but in general ** - IT systems that try to be everything to everybody: CMS, CRM, DMS, ecommerce, ticketing, whatever - *usually* end up:
> 
> 1) being expensive to procure, maintain and change because of the enormous complexity that they represent
> 
> 2) putting organisations at risk of having a single, potentially quite risky, point of failure
> 
> 3) being “ok” at all of those bits, but not excellent at any single one of them
> 
> You’re right - there are risks the other way too. Duplication, redundancy, all of that - these are real problems that will probably never go away. But you often get the same data issues in a monster does-it-all system, surely? You also mention organisations getting stuck - surely they’re much *more* likely to get stuck if they’ve got a 100-ton system that runs everything than if they’ve got 10 systems that do each of the separate bits? What if the owner of that system ups the license fee by 400%? Or goes bust? Or decides they’re not developing their system any more? What then?
> 
> Personally, I prefer having loosely knitted, fit for purpose bits that have a joining principle, rather than a monolithic, central thing. But hey, as I said earlier, that’s a personal view. It comes from my extreme (and probably irrational) hatred of enterprise IT :-)
> 
> Would love to hear what everyone else thinks!
> 
> cheers
> 
> Mike
> 

Electric Lane
Consultancy and Training in Image Archiving and DAM
+44(0)7941316714
+44(0)207607 1415
[log in to unmask]
www.electriclane.co.uk


****************************************************************
       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager