Hi Goncalo,

regarding the memory requirements parsed by
sge_local_submit_attributes.sh Manfred asked my to forward his answer
(his mail got rejected)

>>>
Hi Goncalo,

> I guess you have been changing sge_local_submit_attributes.sh

yes, I have changed sge_local_submit_attributes.sh to implement the
proper translation of $GlueHostMainMemoryRAMSize to s_rss (not: r_vmem
according to the GLUE schema usage guide), and
$GlueHostMainMemoryVirtualSize to s_vmem.

Cheers,
Manfred


On 27.02.2014 11:48, Gonçalo Borges wrote:
> Yup.. Can't access even with my CERN account (I'm not in ATLAS group)
> 
> I guess you have been changing sge_local_submit_attributes.sh to
> implement those changes, right?! If you send us the patch, we can check
> it and try to push it into BLAHP package.
> 
> Cheers
> Goncalo
> 
> On 02/27/2014 10:28 AM, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> I started sketched our experiences with jdl vs. SGE on a twiki page in
>> AtlasComputing
>>
>> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasComputing/JobRequirementsSGE
>>
>> btw: since the page got automatically behind an ACL wall: is there a
>> wiki, that is usable without CERN/LHC VO affiliations in case site
>> admins without affiliations need access?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Thomas
>>
>> On 27.02.2014 09:22, Jeff Templon wrote:
>>> Yo,
>>>
>>>     Dennis van Dok's results for torque / maui are here:
>>>
>>>               
>>> http://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Passing_job_requirements_through_the_WMS
>>>
>>> AFAICT there is a degree of arbitrariness in which (and how)
>>> requirements are translated from the JDL to the batch system.  My
>>> opinion is that some small team should sit down and decide what the
>>> desired behavior is, and then work on implementing this behavior on
>>> each of the batch systems.  It would be really great if this same
>>> behavior is reproduced when passing requirements to an ARC CE or a
>>> GRAM 5 CE.
>>>
>>> The coordination sounds like a job for EGI, however I think the input
>>> to this coordination has to come from a discussion between sites and
>>> the users; sites should drive the discussion, as the sites are the
>>> parties that understand the use cases from multiple user
>>> communities.  Since the WLCG multicore TF is already working on
>>> related issues, we can probably find at least a subset of the right
>>> group of people there. Thomas is one of them!
>>>
>>>             JT
>>>   On Feb 26, 2014, at 19:18 , Thomas Hartmann
>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Goncalo and Maarten,
>>>>
>>>> after some more testing (and debugging of my script...) we were able to
>>>> get CERequirements getting piped to SGE, e.g.
>>>>
>>>> CERequirements = "other.GlueHostMainMemoryVirtualSize > 2000";
>>>> or other.GlueCEPolicyMaxWallClockTime > 30
>>>>
>>>> So far, we tested successfully the CPUTime, WallTime, Mem and VMem
>>>> parameters passing from the jdl to the finally submitted SGE
>>>> wrapper/job.
>>>>
>>>> Do you know, if there are further experiences for SGE and other batch
>>>> systems how the implementation/support is for the various parameters?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers and many thanks for your help,
>>>>   Thomas
>>>>
> 
>